What may satire? Everything! Except be understood by the fool, because then it was not a satire.

What may satire? Everything! Except be understood by the fool, because then it was not a satire.

People feel always terrible offended if you do not believe their lies.

From Wit to Twit(ter)

True Wit is Nature to advantage dress’d, What oft was thought but ne’re so well express’d.

—Alexander Pope, “An Essay on Criticism”

Wit is one of the 10 words investigated by C.S. Lewis in his Studies in Words. He tells us that “wit” was first used to connote “mind, reason, intelligence,” fundamental good sense. Then its meaning changed to suggest a person’s entire mental make-up. Then it rose in aesthetic significance to convey the imaginative skill of poets and other artists. “I take it that wit in the sense now current means that sort of mental agility or gymnastic which uses language as the principal equipment of its gymnasium,” Lewis wrote. The word in our day describes all verbal cleverness, usually of the kind delivered orally. Pun, epigram, repartee, amusing paradox, surprising juxtaposition—these are among the verbal machines on which, to stay with Lewis’s gymnasium metaphor, wit works out.

In imaginative writing—novels, movies, plays, poems—wit in this sense is most frequently found in clever dialogue; or in lyrics of the kind Ira Gershwin, Cole Porter, and Lorenz Hart wrote; or in works of nonfiction in amusing formulations. Falstaff, Shakespeare’s wittiest character, was himself an artist of verbal wit, the Falstaff who said, “I am not only witty in myself, but the cause that wit is in other men.” Written, or literary, wit had a good run in the 18th century: in the plays of William Congreve and Richard Sheridan, in the poetry of Alexander Pope, and in the various works of Jonathan Swift. Wit plays throughout Edward Gibbon’s Decline and Fall, as in his sentence on the Emperor Gordian II: “Twenty-two acknowledged concubines, and a library of sixty-two thousand volumes, attested the variety of his inclinations, and from the productions which he left behind him, it appears that the former as well as the latter were designed for use rather than ostentation.”

Wit has come to find its consummation in conversation. Talk is now its main medium, unrehearsed talk in which someone says something so dazzling as to be memorable. Wit is not, as in writing, evoked in tranquility, but is instead, as Benjamin Errett defines it in Elements of Wit,¹ “spontaneous creativity.” Wit, though generally humorous, needs to be distinguished from humor, which can be created at leisure, polished through revision, and even tested upon focus groups to insure that it works. “Unlike humor,” Errett writes, “wit is a speed game.”

That wit wasn’t always what it is today, a form of brilliant and memorable talk, is attested by such idioms and words as “at wit’s end,” “dimwit,” and “half-wit.” All of these denote the connection between wit and common sense. The dimwit and the half-wit are of course deficient in such sense; to be at wit’s end denotes finding oneself in a situation in which normal common sense is of no avail. Today one is more likely to see wit applied as a label to public personalities who are thought to be clever; for example, that well-known wit…Joseph Epstein.

I have never thought myself a wit, but some years ago, in reviewing a book of mine on snobbery, William F. Buckley Jr. called me “perhaps the wittiest writer (working in his genre) alive, the funniest since Randall Jarrell.” The quotation has turned up as the last line in my Wikipedia entry, with the result that, on the rare occasions when I give a talk or lecture, I am generally introduced as—all qualifications dropped—“the wittiest writer alive.” When this occurs, I hasten to tell my audience that I hope they will not be disappointed when, after four or five minutes into my talk, they come to find Mr. Buckley’s generous contention not merely dubious but definitively disproved.

I wish it were otherwise, but I am not witty. What I believe I am is mildly charming. Charm is the ability to arouse approval for oneself, to seem socially adept. Wit is a more precise skill. Oscar Levant claimed never “to stoop to charm.” Unlike charming people, witty ones can offend, and often don’t care if they do. I myself prefer to be liked rather than admired for such shreds of wit as I do possess.

As a would-be charmer, I have over the years built up a store of anecdotes and fairly surefire jokes that I can trot out when needed. I can drop an interesting quotation with what I hope is lightness of touch. I am alert to the comedy of language and often play off its absurdities, subverting clichés, twisting idioms, doing English in foreign accents. Like the character Sloppy reading the newspapers in Our Mutual Friend, I “do the police in different voices.” I also have a taste for whimsy. Late one afternoon when my sons were growing up, I was at the stove making Italian meat sauce and asked them, as I put a spoonful of sugar into the pot, what movie my doing this reminded them of: the answer was Absorba the Grease after, of course, Zorba the Greek. (My children’s upbringing, plainly, wasn’t an easy one.) None of this, strictly speaking, is wit.

Wit, when available to me at all, is possible only when I can create it in tranquility, on the page, or now increasingly on the computer screen, where there is ample room for rehearsal, as aspiring but inadequate wits might think of revision. But wit in its sense of quick and amusing and often devastating riposte, is not my speciality. Esprit d’escalier, or staircase wit, the witty response that occurs to one too late, is for me rather closer to it.

During my last teaching days, in a course I taught on Henry James, I asked a student named Jonathan Stern to describe the character Gilbert Osmond from James’s The Portrait of a Lady. Without the least intent to offend his teacher or evoke laughter from his classmates, he declared Osmond “an asshole.” I seemed to be the only one in the room shocked by his response, and I told him, calmly, that I would allow each student in the course one such word, and he had now used up his allowance. Only later, leaving class, actually walking down the stairs, did it occur to me that what I should have said was, “I’m pleased, Mr. Stern, that I didn’t ask you to describe Oedipus Rex.”

I have been in the regular company of only one genuinely witty man, my friend Edward Shils. When I told Edward of a mutual acquaintance of ours having recently informed me that, in Prague, where he grew up, his father never shaved himself but always had a barber come in to do so, Edward replied, “You know, Joseph, the truth more likely is that his father shaved his mother.” I once introduced Edward to the English journalist Henry Fairlie. Edward mentioned that he had heard Fairlie had become a socialist, and asked him to explain how this came about. Fairlie replied that he owed his conversion to hearing Michael Harrington speak in Chicago. “Michael Harrington in Chicago?” said Edward. “Surely a case of worst comes to worst.” Of David Reisman, his colleague at the University of Chicago, who attempted to pass himself off as a WASP, Edward remarked, “I’ll say this for David, he’s never taken undue advantage of being Jewish.”

Edward Shils taught half the year at Cambridge in England, a country where the tradition for wit is stronger than it has been in America. Maurice Bowra exemplified high-table Oxbridge wit. When someone told Bowra that the woman he was courting, the niece of Sir Thomas Beecham, was a lesbian, Bowra, himself reputed to be homosexual, replied, “Buggers can’t be choosers.” Noël Coward noted that “having to read footnotes resembles having to go downstairs to answer the door while in the midst of making love.” Evelyn Waugh, surely the wittiest novelist of the past century, in World War II, coming out of a bunker during a German bombing of Yugoslavia, looked up at the sky raining enemy bombs and remarked, “Like everything German, vastly overdone.” Kingsley Amis said that “laziness has become the chief characteristic of journalism, displacing incompetence.” From Beyond the Fringe to Monty Python, English humor at its higher echelons featured wit.

Only a few traces of wit show up in Edward Shils’s writing. No one knew about it who didn’t know him personally; knowledge of his quick cleverness was restricted to his students and his friends. The great wits of the past century found means to have their witty remarks broadcast well beyond their social circle. Among the wits discussed in Errett’s Elements of Wit are Sydney Smith, Mark Twain, Oscar Wilde, Dorothy Parker, Groucho Marx, Winston Churchill, Mae West, George Bernard Shaw, Robert Benchley, and Oscar Levant. Missing are H.L. Mencken, W.C. Fields, Noël Coward, Billy Wilder, and George S. Kaufman. An obvious neurotic, Kaufman, when asked why he left psychotherapy after only a few sessions, claimed, “the guy asked too many goddamn personal questions.” A relentless philanderer, Kaufman told Irving Berlin that he liked his song “Always,” but would prefer it if he changed the title to “Thursdays.”

I learned about these Kaufman quips from a biography of Kaufman by Howard Teichmann. Many of Churchill’s best mots are recorded in other people’s memoirs. Oscar Wilde made a show of his epigrams, paradoxes, and comic aphorisms (“A cynic is someone who knows the price of everything and the value of nothing”) while on tour in America. Traveling round the United States, he put himself perpetually on exhibit, his witty remarks picked up by the press that accompanied him; they accompanied him, in fact, chiefly because his remarks made good copy. The wittiest things said during the 1920s and ’30s at the Algonquin Round Table found their way into Franklin Pierce Adams’s “Conning Tower” column in the old New York World and later the New York Herald-Tribune. Oscar Levant, who let it all hang out before the phrase was invented, made many of his more outlandish remarks on the old Jack Paar Show, and on his own talk show before he was fired for going too far with a joke about Arthur Miller and Marilyn Monroe, oral sex, and keeping kosher. Wits without fame do not get their brilliant lines recorded, at least not in the past they didn’t. The Internet, as we shall see, is changing this, at least somewhat.

Elements of Wit, like the Strunk and White book on composition after which it is titled, is pedagogical in intent. The book sets out on the project of teaching wit by precept and example. Along with offering mini-profiles of some famous wits of the past and present, Benjamin Errett (a Canadian journalist) provides discussion of the role of wit in improv theater; the effect of alcohol on lubricating and loosening wit; and the need for brevity, the soul, after all, of wit. He quotes from various studies on wit and humor; and, inevitably, as is de rigueur these days, he brings in far-from-convincing brain studies and ponders the connection of the physiology of the brain to the creation of wit.

At one point Errett provides a list of 11 contemporary wits. The list includes Russell Brand, Gail Collins, Louis C.K., Nora Ephron, Tina Fey, Christopher Hitchens, Fran Lebowitz, Steve Martin, Amy Poehler, Tom Stoppard, and Kanye West. The rapper Jay-Z, to whom he devotes several pages, is another of his models for wit in action.

Not all these contemporary wits pass Errett’s definition of wit as “spontaneous creation.” We learn that Steve Martin worked out his stand-up comedian’s bits over time, so that little of the finished product of his wit can be said to have been spontaneous. Much of Tina Fey’s wit was scripted for her television shows. Is Russell Brand sufficiently amusing to earn the title? Louis C.K. passes for witty if one’s taste runs to masturbation jokes. Jay-Z’s rap music, much of it created at the moment of recording, may be spontaneous, but does it truly qualify as witty? Lots of things—sarcasm, invective, obscenity—can be created spontaneously without being witty.

Would Christopher Hitchens have seemed witty without an English accent? Wasn’t Hitchens, a man who gave the title The Missionary Position to his book-length attack on Mother Teresa, more a provocateur than a wit? Is there a great difference between Nora Ephron’s complaining about age doing in her neck and the newspaper columnist Erma Bombeck’s writing about the travails of being a housewife—any difference, really, apart from Ephron having had a fancier address and a flashier social set? In the few interviews I have seen with Tom Stoppard, his seriousness easily eclipses his wit. Are these cavils merely? Or do they suggest the lowering of standards on what passes for wit in our time?

Another of Errett’s definitions of wit is “good sense that sparkles.” He prefers cheerful wit; like Joseph Addison, whom he quotes, his taste runs to wit that “gives delight and surprise.” Errett defines snark as wit that “scorches.” Yet much wit is dark, and lots of the richest wit is outrageous. Think of the late Sue Mengers, the movie agent, who walked into a less than exclusive Hollywood party and remarked to a friend: “Schindler’s B-list.” After the Charles Manson murders, Mengers is supposed to have told her client Barbra Streisand, “Don’t worry, honey, they’re only killing bit players.” Saul Bellow, whose propensity for saying witty things sometimes got him in trouble, wrote a story called “Him with His Foot in His Mouth,” about a man who regularly wounded people because he could not control making offensively witty remarks. The wittiest remark in the story belongs not to the story’s narrator but to an older scholar whose boredom is obvious when the narrator reads his scholarly article to him. The narrator asks if he is causing the scholar to fall asleep, to which the scholar answers, “No, you’re keeping me awake.”

Wit is meant to be pleasing, but as often as not it can be cruel. John Simon makes the point that humor is “basically good natured and often directed toward oneself,” while wit is “aggressive, often destructive…and almost always directed at others.” When Clare Boothe Luce held open a door for Dorothy Parker and said “Age before beauty,” Miss Parker, passing through, replied, “Pearls before swine.” Such examples of aggressive wit are generally the most memorable. What stays in the mind are the stabbing riposte, the ripping repartee, the punishing put-down.

Errett bridles at the thought that wit is no more than “clever nastiness.” In his view “wit is the thought process that generates truly funny observations, as well as the most incisive comments, lasting quips, and brilliant asides.” Perhaps his cheerful outlook on the subject of wit compelled him to neglect entirely Gore Vidal, a figure often on the list of contemporary wits. If Vidal had had a motto, it might have been, “If you can’t say something nasty, then say nothing at all.” But Vidal fails the first test of wittiness, which is unpredictability. Predictability is death for wit, and Vidal’s wit was always predictable. Apart from those of his mots devoted to slightly perverse sexual matters—“I am all for bringing back the birch, but only between consenting adults,” is an example—most of the rest are about the crummy, inane, deceitful plutocracy that for him was America. Vidal paraded this merchandise on every talk show that would have him. “I never miss a chance to have sex or appear on television” is another of his mots. One knew what was coming before he opened his mouth; it was only a question of how mean he would be.

Defying anticipation in a way that is both amusing and causing one’s auditors to take thought is one of the hallmarks of genuine wit. Of Doris Day, Oscar Levant remarked: “I knew her before she became a virgin.” Fran Lebowitz, remarking that it’s impossible not to notice that children in America are more and more protected and to a later and later age, claimed that “the man who invents the first shaving mirror for strollers is going to make a fortune.”

If asked to choose an ideal, a perfect, wit, my candidate would be Sydney Smith, the early-19th-century clergyman who was one of the founders of the Edinburgh Review. Errett devotes a few sparse paragraphs to Smith in his book, but not enough to capture the splendor of a true wit at work. The actress Fannie Kemble wrote that “the fanciful and inexhaustible humorous drollery of his [Smith’s] conversation among his intimates can never be adequately rendered or reproduced.” A young Benjamin Disraeli, himself a famously witty man, was once seated next to Sydney Smith at a dinner party and found him “delightful,” adding, “I don’t remember a more agreeable party.” Others reported that they could not remember what he said because in his company they laughed so much. Sydney Smith spoke almost exclusively in mots, lovely metaphors, witty formulations. He said of the garrulous Lord Macaulay that his conversation contained “some gorgeous flashes of silence.” He likened his life as a reviewer and sometimes polemicist to that of a razor, always “either in hot water or scrapes.” Of two women screaming insults at each other from their apartments across a narrow street, he said: “Those two women will never agree. They are arguing from different premises.”

Does wit come naturally, or can one acquire it through effort and training? The assumption behind Elements of Wit is that it can be acquired. “Creative spontaneity,” Errett writes, “takes practice.” Yet his book casts doubt on the notion that wit, even among the most famous wits, really is created spontaneously. Winston Churchill, he informs us, was a reader of Bartlett’s Familiar Quotations and in search of material for conversation sedulously read jokes columns in newspapers. “His magpie mind drew from books, film, media, and anywhere else he read, heard, or saw a line worth repeating.” Errett does not mention La Rochefoucauld, the world’s wittiest aphorist, who worked with his friend and lover Madame de Lafayette at burnishing his aphorisms before bringing them out for display in the salons of Mme. de Rambouillet and Mme. de Sablé, where they were further polished. Might it be that a great deal of what passes for wit—for, in Errett’s term, “spontaneous creation”—isn’t spontaneous at all but has been carefully worked up beforehand?

The leading forum for the display of wit in our days ought to be the television talk show. Yet one doesn’t think of any of the talk-show hosts, now and in the past, as especially witty, if only because all employed or currently employ a cadre of writers who supply them with much of the material that passes for their own wit, though some among them ad lib cleverly. The same, one suspects, may well be true of ostensibly witty talk-show guests, who are often coached about what questions they will be asked and what subjects they can expect to discuss.

Are dazzling wits possible in our day? No reason why they shouldn’t be, though how we might come to know about them is unclear. Might such a wit be someone out there sending witty tweets to friends? The form of the tweet, with its limit of 140 characters, could work to force a tweeter into concise wit. The closing pages of The Elements of Wit offer some amusing tweets. “So now Blagojevich has been double impeached, which sounds like a Ben & Jerry flavor” isn’t at all bad; nor is this, “the most beautiful tweet ever tweeted,” as chosen by Stephen Fry: “I believe we can build a better world! Of course, it’ll take a whole lot of rock, water & dirt. Also not sure where to put it.” I do not myself tweet—to do so would be unseemly in a man of my august age—but I have followed a couple of friends on Twitter, one of whose tweets are consistently amusing. If Twitter does create a new conveyance for wit, a new word for those who display their wit on it will be required—a twit-wit, perhaps.

As for whether wit can be taught, my own sense is that it cannot. Honed and sharpened it can be, but it has to be there to begin with. As Aristotle, in the Poetics, said about metaphor, so one might say about wit: “It is the one thing that cannot be learned; it is also a sign of genius.” Wit, in other words, is a gift. But without an interesting point of view, a detached angle on life, a wide culture, the gift will come to naught. Wit is the expression of those who understand and are able to formulate and deflate in a pleasing way what they see as pretension, false self-esteem, empty ambition, snobbery, and much else worth mocking in life. We need wits on the scene, like doctors on the case. Without them to remind us how absurd we can be, we fall into the grave danger of taking ourselves altogether too seriously.

---

Footnotes

1 Perigee Trade, 256 pages

About the Author

Joseph Epstein, a longtime contributor to Commentary, is the author, most recently, of A Literary Education and Other Essays (Axios Press)

https://www.commentarymagazine.com/article/from-wit-to-twitter/

 The Difference Between American and British Humour

Apart from the spelling of the word, obviously

Time, By Ricky Gervais Nov. 09, 2011

It’s often dangerous to generalize, but under threat, I would say that Americans are more “down the line.” They don’t hide their hopes and fears. They applaud ambition and openly reward success. Brits are more comfortable with life’s losers. We embrace the underdog until it’s no longer the underdog.We like to bring authority down a peg or two. Just for the hell of it. Americans say, “have a nice day” whether they mean it or not. Brits are terrified to say this. We tell ourselves it’s because we don’t want to sound insincere but I think it might be for the opposite reason. We don’t want to celebrate anything too soon. Failure and disappointment lurk around every corner. This is due to our upbringing. Americans are brought up to believe they can be the next president of the United States. Brits are told, “It won’t happen for you.”

There’s a received wisdom in the U.K. that Americans don’t get irony. This is of course not true. But what is true is that they don’t use it all the time. It shows up in the smarter comedies but Americans don’t use it as much socially as Brits. We use it as liberally as prepositions in every day speech. We tease our friends. We use sarcasm as a shield and a weapon. We avoid sincerity until it’s absolutely necessary. We mercilessly take the piss out of people we like or dislike basically. And ourselves. This is very important. Our brashness and swagger is laden with equal portions of self-deprecation. This is our license to hand it out.

This can sometimes be perceived as nasty if the recipients aren’t used to it. It isn’t. It’s play fighting. It’s almost a sign of affection if we like you, and ego bursting if we don’t. You just have to know which one it is.

I guess the biggest difference between the U.S. version and the U.K. version of The Office reflected this. We had to make Michael Scott a slightly nicer guy, with a rosier outlook to life. He could still be childish, and insecure, and even a bore, but he couldn’t be too mean. The irony is of course that I think David Brent’s dark descension and eventual redemption made him all the more compelling. But I think that’s a lot more palatable in Britain for the reasons already stated. Brits almost expect doom and gloom so to start off that way but then have a happy ending is an unexpected joy. Network America has to give people a reason to like you not just a reason to watch you. In Britain we stop watching things like Big Brother when the villain is evicted. We don’t want to watch a bunch of idiots having a good time. We want them to be as miserable as us. America rewards up front, on-your-sleeve niceness. A perceived wicked streak is somewhat frowned upon.

Recently I have been accused of being a shock comic, and cruel and cynical. This is of course almost solely due to a few comments I made as host of last year’s Golden Globes. But nothing could be further from the truth.

I never actively try to offend. That’s churlish, pointless and frankly too easy. But I believe you should say what you mean. Be honest. No one should ever be offended by truth. That way you’ll never have to apologize. I hate it when a comedian says, “Sorry for what I said.” You shouldn’t say it if you didn’t mean it and you should never regret anything you meant to do. As a comedian, I think my job isn’t just to make people laugh but also make them think. As a famous comedian, I also want a strict door policy on my club. Not everyone will like what I say or find it funny. And I wouldn’t have it any other way. There are enough comedians who try to please everyone as it is. Good luck to them, but that’s not my game, I’m afraid.

I’m not one of those people who think that comedy is your conscience taking a day off. My conscience never takes a day off and I can justify everything I do. There’s no line to be drawn in comedy in the sense that there are things you should never joke about. There’s nothing that you should never joke about, but it depends what that joke is. Comedy comes from a good or a bad place. The subject of a joke isn’t necessarily the target of the joke. You can make jokes about race without any race being the butt of the joke. Racism itself can be the butt, for example. When dealing with a so-called taboo subject, the angst and discomfort of the audience is what’s under the microscope. Our own preconceptions and prejudices are often what are being challenged. I don’t like racist jokes. Not because they are offensive. I don’t like them because they’re not funny. And they’re not funny because they’re not true. They are almost always based on a falsehood somewhere along the way, which ruins the gag for me. Comedy is an intellectual pursuit. Not a platform.

As for cynicism, I don’t care for it much. I’m a romantic. From The Office, and Extras to The Invention Of Lying and Cemetery Junction, goodness and sweetness, honour and truth, love and friendship always triumph.

For me, humanity is king.

Oh and for the record I’d rather a waiter say, “Have a nice day” and not mean it, than ignore me and mean it.

 

Gervais is a comedian, actor and producer. The views expressed are solely his own.

http://ideas.time.com/2011/11/09/the-difference-between-american-and-british-humour/

Remember: Do X! Don´t do Y!

Protect innocent, respect life, defend art, preserve creativity!

What´s Left? Antisemitism!

http://www.jsbielicki.com/jsb-79.htm

DJ Psycho Diver Sant – too small to fail
Tonttu Korvatunturilta Kuunsilta JSB
Tip tap tip tap tipetipe tip tap heija!
http://www.psychosputnik.com
http://www.saatchionline.com/jsbielicki
https://psychosputnik.wordpress.com/

They want 1984, we want 1776

They are on the run, we are on the march!

 

 

Dummheit ist, wenn jemand nicht weiß, was er wissen könnte.

Political correctness ist, wenn man aus Feigheit lügt, um Dumme nicht zu verärgern, die die Wahrheit nicht hören wollen.

“Im Streit um moralische Probleme, ist der Relativismus die erste Zuflucht der Schurken.“ Roger Scruton

Antisemitismus ist, wenn man Juden, Israel übelnimmt, was man anderen nicht übelnimmt.

Islam ist weniger eine Religion und mehr eine totalitäre Gesellschaftsordnung, eine Ideologie, die absoluten Gehorsam verlangt und keinen Widerspruch, keinerlei Kritik duldet und das Denken und Erkenntnis verbietet. Der wahre Islam ist ganz anders, wer ihn findet wird eine hohe Belohnung erhalten.

Wahnsinn bedeute, immer wieder das gleiche zu tun, aber dabei stets ein anderes Resultat zu erwarten.

Gutmenschen sind Menschen, die gut erscheinen wollen, die gewissenlos das Gewissen anderer Menschen zu eigenen Zwecken mit Hilfe selbst inszenierter Empörungen instrumentalisieren.

Irritationen verhelfen zu weiteren Erkenntnissen, Selbstzufriedenheit führt zur Verblödung,

Wenn ein Affe denkt, „ich bin ein Affe“, dann ist es bereits ein Mensch.

Ein Mensch mit Wurzeln soll zur Pediküre gehen.

Wenn jemand etwas zu sagen hat, der kann es immer sehr einfach sagen. Wenn jemand nichts zu sagen hat, der sagt es dann sehr kompliziert.

Sucht ist, wenn jemand etwas macht, was er machen will und sucht jemand, der es macht, daß er es nicht macht und es nicht machen will.

Sollen die Klugen immer nachgeben, dann wird die Welt von Dummen regiert. Zu viel „Klugheit“ macht dumm.

Wenn man nur das Schlechte bekämpft, um das Leben zu schützen, bringt man gar nichts Gutes hervor und ein solches Leben ist dann nicht mehr lebenswert und braucht nicht beschützt zu werden, denn es ist dann durch ein solches totales Beschützen sowieso schon tot. Man kann so viel Geld für Versicherungen ausgeben, daß man gar nichts mehr zum Versichern hat. Mit Sicherheit ist es eben so.

Zufriedene Sklaven sind die schlimmsten Feinde der Freiheit.

Kreativität ist eine Intelligenz, die Spaß hat.

Wen die Arbeit krank macht, der soll kündigen!

Wenn Deutsche über Moral reden, meinen sie das Geld.

Ein Mensch ohne Erkenntnis ist dann  lediglich ein ängstlicher, aggressiver, unglücklicher Affe.

Denken ist immer grenzüberschreitend.

Der Mob, der sich das Volk nennt, diskutiert nicht, sondern diffamiert.

Legal ist nicht immer legitim.

Wer nicht verzichten kann, lebt unglücklich.

Sogenannte Sozial-, Kultur-, Geisteswissenschaften, Soziologie, Psychologie, Psychotherapie, Psychoanalyse, sind keine Wissenschaften mehr, sondern immanent religiöse Kultpropheten, organisiert wie Sekten.

Ohne eine starke Opposition atrophiert jede scheinbare Demokratie zur Tyrannei, und ebenso eine Wissenschaft, zur Gesinnung einer Sekte.

Man kann alles nur aus gewisser Distanz erkennen, wer sich ereifert, empört, wer mit seiner Nase an etwas klebt, der hat die Perspektive verloren, der erkennt nichts mehr, der hat nur noch seine Phantasie von der Welt im Kopf. So entsteht Paranoia, die sich Religion, und Religion als Politik, sogar als Wissenschaft nennt.

Islamisten sind eine Gefahr, deswegen werden sie als solche nicht gesehen. Juden sind keine Gefahr, deswegen werden sie als solche gesehen. So funktioniert die Wahrnehmung von  Feiglingen.

Humorlose Menschen könner nur fürchten oder hassen und werden Mönche oder Terroristen.

Menschen sind nicht gleich, jeder einzelne Mensch ist ein Unikat.

Erkenntnis gilt für alle, auch für Muslime, Albaner, Frauen und Homosexuelle.

Islam gehört zu Deutschland, Judentum gehört zu Israel.

Der Konsensterror (Totalitarismus) ist in Deutschland allgegenwärtig.

Es wird nicht mehr diskutiert, sondern nur noch diffamiert.

Es ist eine Kultur des Mobs. Wie es bereits gewesen ist.

Harmonie ist nur, wenn man nicht kommuniziert.

Man soll niemals mit jemand ins Bett gehen, der mehr Probleme hat, als man selbst.

>>Evelyn Waugh, sicherlich der witzigste Erzähler des vergangenen Jahrhunderts, im Zweiten Weltkrieg, herauskommend aus einem Bunker während einer deutschen Bombardierung Jugoslawiens, blickte zum Himmel, von dem es feindliche Bomben regnete und bemerkte: “Wie alles Deutsche, stark übertrieben.“<< Joseph Epstein

Man muß Mut haben, um witzig zu sein.

Dumm und blöd geht meistens zusammen.

Charlie Hebdo: solche Morde an Juden sind euch egal, mal sehen wie”angemessen”  ihr reagiert, wenn (wenn, nicht falls) eure Städte von Islamisten mit Kasam-Raketen beschossen werden.

Christopher Hitchens großartig: „In einer freien Gesellschaft hat niemand das Recht, nicht beleidigt zu werden.“

Je mehr sich jemand narzisstisch aufbläht, desto mehr fühlt er sich beleidigt und provoziert.

“Das Problem mit der Welt ist, daß die Dummen felsenfest überzeugt sind und die Klugen voller Zweifel.” – Bertrand Russel

Das Problem mit den Islamisten in Europa soll man genauso lösen, wie es Europa für den Nahen Osten verlangt: jeweils eine Zweistaatenlösung, die Hälfte für Muslime, die andere Hälfte für Nicht-Muslime, mit einer gemeinsamen Hauptstadt.

Was darf Satire? Alles! Nur nicht vom Dummkopf verstanden werden, weil es dann keine Satire war.

Islam ist verantwortlich für gar nichts, Juden sind schuld an allem.

Islamisten sind Satanisten.

Leute fühlen sich immer furchtbar beleidigt, wenn man ihre Lügen nicht glaubt.

 

Stupidity is demonstrated by people lacking the knowledge they could achieve

Political correctness can be defined as the telling of a lie out of the cowardice in an attempt to avoid upsetting fools not willing to face up to the truth

“In arguments about moral problems, relativism is the first refuge of the scoundrel.” Roger Scruton

Antisemitism is when one blames the Jews or Israel for issues, he does not blame others

Islam is less a religion and more a totalitarian society, an ideology that demands absolute obedience and tolerates no dissent, no criticism, and prohibits the thinking, knowledge and recognition. True Islam is totally different, the one who will find it will receive a very high reward.

Craziness is, when one always does the same but expects a different outcome

If a monkey thinks “I am a monkey”, then it is already a human

A man with roots should go for a pedicure

Self smugness leads to idiocy, being pissed off leads to enlightenment

If someone has something to say, he can tell it always very easily. If someone has nothing to say, he says it in a very complicated way

Addiction is, when somebody does something he wants to do, yet seeks someone who can make it so he won’t do it and doesn’t want to, either.

If the clever people always gave in, the world would be reigned by idiots. Too much “cleverness” makes you stupid.

If one only fights evil to protect life, one produces nothing good at all and such a life then becomes no longer worth living and thus requires no protection, for it is already unlived due to such a total protection. One can spend so much money on insurance, that one has nothing left to insure. Safety works in the same way.

Happy slaves are the worst enemies of freedom.

Creativity is an intelligence having fun.

If working makes you sick, fuck off, leave the work!

If Germans talk about morality, they mean money.

A man without an insight is just an anxious, aggressive, unhappy monkey.

Thinking is always trespassing.

The mob, who calls himself the people, does not discuss, just defames.

Legal is not always legitimate.

Who can not do without, lives unhappy.

So called social, culture sciences, sociology, psychology psychotherapy, psychoanalysis, are not anymore scientific, but immanent religious cult-prophets, organized as sects.

Without a strong opposition any apparent democracy atrophies to a tyranny, and as well a science , to an attitude of a religious sect.

You can recognize everything from a certain distance only, who is zealous, outraged, who sticks his nose in something, this one has lost the perspective, he recognizes anything more, he has only his imagination of the world in his head. This creates paranoia, which is called religion, and a religion as politics, even as a science.

Islamists are a real danger, therefore they will not be seen as such. Jews are not a danger, therefore they are seen as such. It is how the perception by cowards functions.

People without a sense of humor are able only to fear or to hate and become monks or terrorists.

People are not equal, each single person is unique.

Insight applies to everyone, including Muslims, Albanians, women and homosexuals.

Islam belongs to Germany, Judaism belongs to Israel.

The totalitarian Terror of consensus is ubiquitous in Germany.
There are no discussions anymore, but defamations only.
It is a culture of the mob. As it has already been.
Harmony is only if you do not communicate.

One should never go to bed with someone who has more problems than you already have.

>>Evelyn Waugh, surely the wittiest novelist of the past century, in World War II, coming out of a bunker during a German bombing of Yugoslavia, looked up at the sky raining enemy bombs and remarked, “Like everything German, vastly overdone.”<< Joseph Epstein

One has to be brave, to have a wit.

Stupid and dull belong mostly together.

Charlie Hebdo: you don´t care if such murders are comitted to Jews, we will see how “adequate” you will react when (when, not if), Islamists will begin to bombard your cities with Kasam missiles.

Christopher Hitchens: “In a free society, no one has the right not to be offended.“

The more someone narcissistic inflates , the more he feels insulted and provoked.

“The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt.” – Bertrand Russell

 The problem with the Islamists in Europe should be solved exactly as Europe requires to the Middle East: a two-state solution, a half for muslims and the another half for not-muslims , with a common capital.

What may satire? Everything! Except be understood by the fool, because then it was not a satire.

Islam is not responsible for anything Jews are guilty of everything.

Islamists are satanists.

 People feel always terrible offended if you do not believe their lies.

The New Totalitarianism: You are free to do everything they want

 

The New Totalitarianism

A dystopia (from the Greek δυσ- and τόπος, alternatively, cacotopia, kakotopia, or anti-utopia) is a community or society that is in some important way undesirable or frightening. It is literally translated as „not-good place“, an antonym of utopia. Such societies appear in many artistic works, particularly in stories set in a future. Dystopias are often characterized by dehumanization, totalitarian governments, environmental disaster, or other characteristics associated with a cataclysmic decline in society. Dystopian societies appear in many sub-genres of fiction and are often used to draw attention to real-world issues regarding society, environment, politics, economics, religion, psychology, ethics, science, and/or technology, which if unaddressed could potentially lead to such a dystopia-like condition.

Famous depictions of dystopian societies include R.U.R. (which introduced the concept of robots and the word „robot“ for the first time); Nineteen Eighty-Four, which takes place in a totalitarian invasive super state; Brave New World, where the society’s energy is forcibly directed into drug-addled consumerism and hedonism; Fahrenheit 451, where the state burns books to create apathy and disinterest in the general public; A Clockwork Orange, where the state uses psychological torture to reform violent youths; Blade Runner in which engineered „replicants“ infiltrate society and must be hunted down before they injure humans; The Matrix, in which the human species is trapped in a virtual reality world created by intelligent machines, The Hunger Games, in which the government controls its people by maintaining a constant state of fear through forcing randomly selected children to participate in an annual fight to the death; Logan’s Run, in which both population and the consumption of resources are maintained in equilibrium by requiring the death of everyone reaching a particular age; Soylent Green, where society suffers from pollution, overpopulation, depleted resources, poverty, dying oceans, a hot climate, and much of the population survives on processed food rations, including „soylent green“.

Jack London’s novel The Iron Heel was described by Erich Fromm as „the earliest of the modern Dystopia“.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dystopia

A chapter from Michael O’Brien’s book, The Family and the New Totalitarianism (currently out of print) published in 1995 by the White Horse Press, Canada.

The word totalitarianism usually generates impressions of dictatorial systems which crush civic freedoms and negate the humanity of their subjects in an effort to achieve complete control. Images of barbed wire, jack-boots and thought-control are conjured up in our minds. 20th century literature has given us some powerful works of fiction which suggest a variety of possible totalitarian futures: one thinks immediately of Orwell’s 1984 and Huxley’s Brave New World. Common to these dystopias (utopias which have collapsed into tyranny) is the absolutizing of the power of the State, or systems controlled by the State.

Totalitarianism invariably strives to do away with genuine absolutes and to establish false absolutes in their place. Genuine absolutes are fundamental, ultimate, unqualified truths, independent of the ebb and flow of cultures, fashions, myths and prejudices. An example of genuine moral absolutes is the Ten Commandments. An example of false absolutes can be found in Marx’s ideology, where a theory called dialectic is posited as the mechanism which determines human history—an “abstraction” that has resulted in hundreds of millions of violent deaths.

G.K. Chesterton wrote in his 1935 book, The Well and the Shallows:

“It is the State which changes; it is the State which destroys; it is nearly always the State which persecutes. The Totalitarian State is now making a clean sweep of all our old notions of liberty, even more than the French Revolution made a clean sweep of all the old ideas of loyalty. It is the Church that excommunicates; but in that very word implies that a communion stands open for a restored communicant. It is the State that exterminates; it is the State that abolishes absolutely and altogether; whether it is the American State abolishing beer, or the Fascist State abolishing parties; or the Hitlerite State abolishing almost everything but itself.”

Chesterton touches upon an important characteristic of totalitarian states. The absolute ruler always attempts to destroy diversity. He cannot rest content with a passive populace. As he extends his grasp into more and more aspects of human life he becomes hostile to everything outside of his own will. As his power becomes near absolute it grows increasingly negative, because by its very nature it must oppose what cannot be extinguished in the human person. It must seek at some point to destroy the inner impulse to genuine creativity which depends for its well-being on freedom from manipulation.

The tyrant in the beginning rarely looks like a monster. He usually appears to be the savior of his people, though once he has attained power he soon shows his hand—at root he merely wishes to accumulate as much power as possible in order to obtain an absolute security or glory for himself, and to enjoy it at any cost. This kind of tyrant is not difficult to identify. When he runs out of gasoline or bullets or wheat the people cast him off, because he is a monster who looks like a monster. He has blown his cover. More difficult to pin down and to throw off is the idealistic tyrant who expands his power in order to protect what he considers to be the good of his subjects. He will reduce crime and make the trains run on time. He will balance the budget and bring order and a measure of material plenty to the nation. He will labor to make a better citizen of the raw material of his subjects. There can be a reassuring sense of security in all this. We like dependable public services and an ordered economy, though we would, perhaps, remain uneasy about trading away certain freedoms. But it is precisely the elimination of personal responsibility which is the tyrant’s ultimate goal, for this is what he sees as our fatal flaw.

It must be understood that the highly motivated idealist is not merely interested in improving the exterior forms of society. He wishes to save us from ourselves. Of course, he will find that basic human nature is rather difficult to remold, and as time goes on he will need to continuously expand his power until his control approaches the level of totality. If he is clever at it and fills up the world with beautiful rhetoric, and takes care not to grossly infringe upon our pleasurable rights, and if, at the same time, he takes upon his own shoulders our unpleasant rights, the ones which demand effort and sacrifice, then he may get away with it. This is never more possible than in a historical period of extreme stress. In such a climate the lifting of our responsibilities is not felt as deprivation; it feels, rather, like relief from intolerable tensions. Somebody at last is doing something about the human condition! A sick society is getting therapy! A cancer patient puts himself into the hands of his doctor, so why shouldn’t a “dysfunctional” people entrust itself to its social or political physicians? Somewhere during the therapy there is a decisive transfer of power and responsibility. When this happens on a massive scale something is seriously amiss. There may not be brown-shirts and jackboots marching in the streets. No public book-burnings. No grotesque executions. In some cases there may even be no visible dictator, only a system or a social philosophy which permeates and controls everything. Indeed, the world may appear to be perfectly normal. The Catholic philosopher Josef Pieper points out that this is the most dangerous form of totalitarianism of all, almost impossible to throw off, because it never appears to be what, in fact, it is.

Both the monster tyrant and the “humanitarian” tyrant offer something that appears to be a good. Both, in the end, will exact a terrible price. The person who wishes to remain free must understand that he cannot and should not pay that price. In the beginning the payments may appear small and harmless enough. We are asked to compromise a little here, a little there, unsuspecting that eventually there will be no strength left to resist the betrayal of everything. Pope John Paul II once said, “I would a thousand times rather have a persecuted Church than a compromised Church.” The Church stands as the one defender of the entire range of human and divine absolutes in the world. She knows that if she wishes to remain free—that is, free in the fullest sense of the word, free to be completely herself, free to defend Love and Truth—she must be ever willing to be a sign of contradiction, and if necessary to accept that society will condemn her.

Christopher Dawson, in The Judgment of the Nations contrasted the collapse of the Roman Empire to the collapse of a Christian civilization. He believed that something far more ominous is at work in the latter:

“For the civilization which has been undermined, and is now threatened by total subversion, is a Christian civilization, built on the spiritual values and religious ideals of Saint Augustine and his like; and its adversary is not the simple barbarism of alien peoples who stand on a lower cultural level, but new Powers armed with all the resources of scientific technique, which are inspired by a ruthless will to power, that recognizes no law save that of their own strength.”

Dawson was referring to overt tyrannies. However, he went on to sound some additional warnings for us all:

“Thus, the situation that Christians have to face today has more in common with that described by the author of the Apocalypse than with the age of St. Augustine. The world is strong and it has evil masters. But these masters are not vicious autocrats like Nero and Domitian. They are the engineers of the mechanism of world power: a mechanism that is more formidable than anything the ancient world knew, because it is not confined to external means, like the despotisms of the past, but uses all the resources of modern psychology to make the human soul the motor of its dynamic purpose.”

Dawson was describing here the shape of a possible future, a global non-violent totalitarianism that is the most serious of all tyrannies, from the Christian viewpoint, because in it evil has become depersonalized, “separated from individual appetite and passion, and exalted . . . into a sphere in which all moral values are confused and transformed. The great terrorists . . . have not been immoral men, but rigid puritans who did evil coldly, by principle.”

In his fascinating book, Inside the Third Reich, Albert Speer, Hitler’s architect and armaments minister, wrote about the state of mind of the German people as Hitler rose to power. He says that most Germans disliked the sinister side of Hitler’s policies, but in a spirit of optimism, they assumed that he would leave behind his more unpleasant policies once he attained the dignity of high office. They overlooked his errors because they thought his form of law and order would be a lesser evil than the social disruption they were suffering during the nineteen twenties and thirties. By succumbing to the “lesser evil” argument, they brought upon the world an evil of epic proportions.

But what happens to the discernment of a people when a tyrant arrives without any of the usual sinister costumes of brutal dictators? What happens when the errors come in pleasing disguises, and are promoted by very fine people? Those living in such an environment have more than one difficulty to overcome in properly assessing what is happening. They find themselves within the events which are unfolding, and thus are faced with the problem of perception: how to see the hidden structure of their chaotic times, how to step outside of it and to view it objectively while remaining within it as a participant, as an agent for the good.

How are we Catholic people to do this if we are not rooted in the Truth? Will we be willing to compromise moral absolutes in the education of our children merely because attractive personalities, very intelligent idealists, say we should? Will the homogenization of our children’s minds be acceptable simply because we want the next generation to be nicely outfitted to cope with a profoundly disordered society? Will we be willing to sacrifice genuine diversity for the sake of the illusion of unity? Did our Catholic people help to elect a murderous social movement in this province and others, because its economic policies appeared to be kinder to the poor than the capitalist party that it replaced, forgetting the fact that abortion takes the life of far more children of the poor than children of the comfortable? Just as Dawson predicted, the confusion and transformation of moral values is seen widely as a moral cause.

How long will it take for our people to understand that when humanist sentiments replace moral absolutes, it is not long before very idealistic people begin to invade human families in the name of the family, and destroy human lives in the name of humanity? This is the idealist’s greatest temptation, the temptation by which nations and cultures so often fall. The wielder of power is deluded into thinking he can remold reality into a less unkind condition. If he succeeds in convincing his people of the delusion and posits for them an enemy of the collective good, then unspeakable evils can be released in society. Those who share a mass-delusion rarely recognize it as such, and can pursue the most heinous acts in a spirit of self-righteousness. Democracies are not immune from such delusions, although they tend to forms of oppression that are not overtly violent. Democracies in decline, however, will eventually revert to covert oppression and the overt, gradual erosion of human rights.

In his 1995 encyclical Evangelium Vitae, The Gospel of Life, John Paul II writes:

This is what is happening also at the level of politics and government: the original and inalienable right to life is questioned or denied on the basis of a parliamentary vote or the will of one part of the people—even if it is the majority. This is the sinister result of a relativism which reigns unopposed: the “right” ceases to be such, because it is no longer firmly founded on the inviolable dignity of the person, but is made subject to the will of the stronger part. In this way democracy, contradicting its own principles, effectively moves towards a form of totalitarianism. The State is no longer the “common home” where all can live together on the basis of principles of fundamental equality, but is transformed into a tyrant State, which arrogates to itself the right to dispose of the life of the weakest and most defenceless members, from the unborn child to the elderly, in the name of a public interest which is really nothing but the interest of one part. The appearance of the strictest respect for legality is maintained, at least when the laws permitting abortion and euthanasia are the result of a ballot in accordance with what are generally seen as the rules of democracy. Really, what we have here is only the tragic caricature of legality; the democratic ideal, which is only truly such when it acknowledges and safeguards the dignity of every human person, is betrayed in its very foundations: How is it still possible to speak of the dignity of every human person when the killing of the weakest and most innocent is permitted? In the name of what justice is the most unjust of discriminations practiced: some individuals are held to be deserving of defense and others are denied that dignity? When this happens, the process leading to the breakdown of a genuinely human co-existence and the disintegration of the State itself has already begun. . . .

In seeking the deepest roots of the struggle between the “culture of life” and the “culture of death”, we cannot restrict ourselves to the perverse idea of freedom mentioned above. We have to go to the heart of the tragedy being experienced by modern man: the eclipse of the sense of God and man, typical of a social and cultural climate dominated by secularism, which, with its ubiquitous tentacles, succeeds at times in putting Christian communities themselves to the test. Those who allow themselves to be influenced by this climate easily fall into a sad and vicious circle: when the sense of God is lost, there is also a tendency to lose the sense of man.

Our defense of reality itself, our resistance to various forms of totalitarianism, will demand both strong reactive measures and pro-active ones: an examination of conscience, a restoration of reverence for the “whole truth about man,” a return to Gospel principles in all aspects of our lives, and above all a profound conversion to worship of God. We must become a people who are in submissio, that is, submitted completely to the mission of the Church, in statu missionis. Thus, fully within the mainstream of grace, under the mantle of God’s divine authority, and uniting ourselves to the obedience of Christ on the Cross, we participate in the reversal of Adam’s sin. In this way we will find a personal, secret joy hidden within the crucifixion of our willfulness, a gateway to freedom, a dying that leads to life. And in doing so we will assist in the redemption of the world.

We must also support a widespread rebirth of those small, diverse, and beautiful works of man which retain their human dimensions and thereby foster the full meaning of the human person. There is need for a rediscovery of the family farm, cottage industries, new and old literature that is as vital as it is true, arts and crafts that are beautiful and made with love, schools small enough so that children can be known and nurtured as unique individuals, worker-owned co-operatives, small presses, libraries, community bees, works of mercy, discussion groups, etc.—these are only a beginning. We must learn and relearn that the only effective response to degeneracy, political, cultural, or otherwise, is to create an alternate culture that is so good, so beautiful, and so true that man is drawn back to his own true home.

The rediscovery of the family as a genuine social absolute is a crucial element of mankind’s rediscovery of this home. We must hope for it against all odds, but in the hoping we must have a realistic understanding of what those odds are. Pessimism is not Christian hope; nor is naïve optimism. We should not underestimate the capacity of modern man for self-delusion, especially when he has a great deal invested emotionally in the delusion. If awareness of the sacredness of the family has waned in our era, it is only partly due to attacks by exterior enemies. Catholics, to put it simply, have not valued Truth. In many of the particular churches we have been poorly educated in knowledge of the Truth and even more poorly educated in the spirituality of living the Truth. We did not see that our very lives hang upon the effective defense of Truth. As a result we have been fundamentally weakened and rendered virtually unprotected against the onslaught of propaganda from the media and the social sciences, which for many years have posited the origins of most human “dysfunction” in the internal politics of the family. Traditional marriage and family life are now commonly considered to be a form of oppression, even bondage. This, coupled to a loss of the sense of sin, has created a generation in which men and women no longer feel ennobled by self-sacrifice and the honoring of commitments. Nor do they feel endangered by the world of evil, by the possibility of personal slavery to invisible forces or to their own fallen natures. It is difficult for them to imagine that a pagan state might one day reinstitute an exterior form of slavery (although it would call it by a more attractive name). In his l930 essay “The New Paganism,” Hilaire Belloc noted that the liberal mind always abhors slavery in theory, but in the future, when liberalism has brought about the return of paganism, it will shortly thereafter resurrect the grand old institution of . . . slavery. However, he suggests, it will then be called “permanent employment.” Most people will have become unable to recognize that it is, in fact, what it is.

The supposed rationality of the idealist is perhaps the worst aspect of his condition, for it renders him less capable of pausing for a moment of reflection on what is real, or experiencing a healthy skirmish with self-doubt. It is this invincible self-righteousness which should alert us to the possibility that we may be living in the preliminary stages of a massive shift to totalitarian Statism on every level of society—including our religious institutions. If so, what are its exact parameters? How far will it go to usurp the perennial rights and duties of man? And if it is going to go very far (which is not yet certain) how do we stand in its path and resist it?

There are no precise blueprints of totalitarianism, for by its nature, even in its exercise of power, it is a shifting mirage. It does not know what it is, because it has no real absolutes on which to stand still and to know itself. It is urgent, therefore, that we recognize it for what it is, wherever it takes on a new form and attempts to dominate the human community. But how are we to accurately identify a force which appears in pleasing shapes and absorbs institutions with hardly an indiscretion? There are some traits which are common to violent and nonviolent forms of totalitarianism alike. The former justifies its harsh measures in the name of a so-called greater good—usually “the good of the people.” Soft totalitarianism is not fundamentally different in this regard, although its invasion of the rights and duties of man are executed with somewhat more diplomacy. We must remember here that in the beginning most oppressive regimes do not begin with overt oppression; in their early stages they appear as liberators. But when the moral foundations have crumbled under the euphoric advance of theory, it is only a matter of time before the living reality works out its awful consequences in practice. It bears repeating that this form is in the long run more destructive of the family, for it preserves the illusion of freedom. It directs its subjects to many roads, but the roads do not lead anywhere. It creates an impression of a broader world, but it is a vast prison, on the borders of which are impenetrable walls—impenetrable most of all because its residents have come to believe that there is nothing beyond it. It maintains power by continuously shifting the ground on which its subjects stand. Right, wrong, good, evil, and the identity of persons and things are each re-examined in an ongoing inquisition.

In his 1993 encyclical Veritatis Splendor, The Splendor of Truth, John Paul II warns of the consequences of sliding into this moral relativism:

Today, when many countries have seen the fall of ideologies which bound politics to a totalitarian conception of the world—Marxism being the foremost of these—there is no less grave a danger that the fundamental rights of the human person will be denied and that the religious yearnings which arise in the heart of every human being will be absorbed once again into politics. This is the risk of an alliance between democracy and ethical relativism, which would remove any sure reference point from political and social life, and on a deeper level make the acknowledgment of truth impossible. Indeed, “if there is no ultimate truth to guide and direct political activity, then ideas and convictions can easily be manipulated for reasons of power. As history demonstrates, a democracy without values easily turns into open or thinly disguised totalitarianism.”

Clearly, the Holy Father is not saying that Christians should abandon politics, for elsewhere he urges us to involve ourselves directly in the political process. He is here warning mankind against the folly of making politics into a religion that would displace the absolute rights of God and morality. The danger of this is so immediate that we can now reply to Marxism’s famous sneer, “Religion is the opiate of the masses,” with the more accurate observation that the politics of manipulation is the opiate of romantic intellectuals. Have we arrived at the stage where the politics of manipulation, and the manipulation of politics, is indeed drugging the people of the traditionally democratic nations? Consider that in the present day West, the arts, the media, the courts, education, psychology, sociology and anthropology and their hybrid disciplines, have contributed to a redefinition of the human person. Judging by the literature and the rhetoric coming out of these seemingly disparate movements, they have made a unanimous leap of faith: the restoration of man, apparently, now largely depends on the restructuring of behaviour and personality.

In his masterful essay on education, The Abolition of Man, C. S. Lewis pointed out that man’s power to make of himself what he pleases really means the power of some men to make of other men what they please. In other words, the human person will be increasingly perceived as a cell in a collective, needing not so much redemption by conversion as re-education and rehabilitation. Lewis foresaw that programs of reform would be developed and managed by a new class which he called The Conditioners. They will not be bad men, he advised. They will be highly motivated, and in fact will see themselves as the producers of motivation. They will become more and more dangerous as they are “armed with the powers of an omni-competent state and an irresistible scientific technique.” Their primary point of focus will be the reconstruction of human conscience: “They know how to produce conscience and decide what kind of conscience they will produce.” They themselves are outside, above, the dictates of the very conscience they produce, yet they consider themselves “the servants and guardians of humanity.”

Lewis observed the growth of this phenomenon from a Christian perspective, but there were non-Christian minds of his generation who also saw it developing. Aldous Huxley, in Brave New World Revisited (l958), said that the totalitarianism he had foreseen in l931 was materializing in the Western world at a much faster rate than he had thought possible. In Brave New World he had predicted a society in which the family, religion, language and art had been neutered and all conflicts eliminated by genetic engineering. He portrayed a perfect synthesis of technology and paganism. In Revisited he had come to believe that the totalitarianism of the immediate future would be less visibly violent than that of the Hitlers and Stalins, but it would create a society “painlessly regimented by a corps of highly trained social engineers.” He maintained that in such a society “democracy and freedom will be the theme of every broadcast and editorial,” but the underlying substance would be a seemingly benign totalitarianism. Huxley’s otherwise perceptive book was itself a victim of the modern misunderstanding of authority. He could not see the connection between his own brand of liberalism and the world it was helping to create. The book is marred by his prejudice against the Church, which he lumps together with Marxism and Fascism. George Orwell makes the same mistake in his famous essay “Politics and the English Language.” Like so many modern anti-totalitarians, they failed to distinguish between raw power and responsible exercise of authority. We should note their failure carefully, for if even the most honest and courageous minds in the secular camp cannot grasp such basic distinctions, then late Western man is in grave trouble.

Modern secularists, regardless of how articulate they may be, are very often victims of one-dimensional thinking. In Mere Christianity C.S. Lewis points out:

“Christianity thinks of human individuals not as mere members of a group or items in a list, but as organs in a body—different from one another and each contributing what no other could. When you find yourself wanting to turn your children, or pupils, or even your neighbors, into people exactly like yourself, remember that God probably never meant them to be that. You and they are different organs, intended to do different things. On the other hand, when you are tempted not to bother about someone else’s troubles because they are ‘no business of yours’, remember that though he is different from you he is part of the same organism as you. If you forget that he belongs to the same organism as yourself you will be come an Individualist. If you forget that he is a different organ from you, if you want to suppress differences and make people all alike, you will become a Totalitarian. But a Christian must not be either a Totalitarian or an Individualist.

“I feel a strong desire to tell you—and I expect you feel a strong desire to tell me—which of these two errors is the worse. That is the Devil getting at us. He always sends errors into the world in pairs of opposites. And he always encourages us to spend a lot of time thinking which is the worse. You see why, of course? He relies on your extra dislike of the one error to draw you gradually into the opposite one. But do not let us be fooled. We have to keep our eyes on the goal and go straight through between both errors.”

There is a dangerous crack in the mind of modern man. In his supposed love for liberty and hatred of tyranny, he ignores the yawning crevasse which has opened up between freedom and responsibility. Unless those two are bridged by moral absolutes, he must eventually fall into the abyss, dragging his society in after him. In doing so he may unwittingly inflict a totalitarianism more complete than the full frontal attacks of monsters like Hitler and Stalin. The straw man of an “Inquisitional Catholic Church” lurks like a bogey in his subconscious; it does not impress him that the Roman Catholic Church has functioned for more than a century solely as a spiritual authority. It has no police, no armies, only the force of Truth and Love operating in the consciences of men. Veritas and Caritas, the Church knows, are the only real guarantees of social and individual freedoms. Curiously, it is her persistence in this regard which is found most objectionable to the modern mind, and especially to the totalitarian mind, violent and non-violent alike. The Catholic Church is portrayed on many levels of culture (including arts, communications media, education, and politics) as the monolithic structure thath produces oppressed and oppressive personalities. Modern liberalism in its secular and religious mutations is creating this universal impression. The world it is forming is in an agony of moral and spiritual sterility. Truth is made relative, undependable. Love is eroded in the name of love, communication rendered pointless in the name of “openness,” human life is devalued (being itself is despised) in the name of “quality of life.” We swim in a tide of such ominous symptoms but we have come to think of them as “normal.” We assume that the barbaric and the diabolical will be restrained by the democratic process. This is colossally naïve. Not only does it fly in the face of the very informative events which have taken place in our century, it ignores some key warning bells which are ringing here and there in the Western world.

We are at a turning point in history. The extraordinary pontificate of John Paul II is drawing many souls back to God, and even some nations to reflection on the moral absolutes and the meaning of man. The Church has all the resources necessary to restore man to his sense of purpose and identity. Yet, in the exercise of the ecclesial life of the West a kind of schizophrenia continues: we pay lip service to the Truth, and go on to do what we feel like. We say “Yes” and do “No,” but cushion the disobedience with subtly nuanced theology. The magisterial authority of the teaching Church is ignored while near-infallibility is conferred upon academic experts and committees.

Crucial choices have arrived and more are approaching. The abortion and euthanasia issues are the most ugly of these crises, but they are symptoms of something much deeper. We face a situation similar to the crisis which Christian Germany reached when the National Socialists enacted the racial laws, when state-sanctioned evil was funded by a large number of its citizenry who regarded the acts they were paying for through taxes to be crimes. Is this acceptable merely because the state or that elusive “voice of the people” has decided that the Jew or the pre-birth child is not quite human? And in a few short years will the orthodox Catholic or Christian be considered “an enemy of the people?” And will the family which fails to conform to state-defined notions of health be categorized as “dysfunctional,” and thus undeserving of custody of their children? If we should wake up some morning to find that a massive infrastructure of Conditioners is proceeding with the reconditioning of society—in the name of the people, in the name of the family, in the name of the child—who then will judge the State, and who will judge the people? Will we look back upon the present as the last brief period in which it was still possible to reverse the tide?

Is this a paranoiac nightmare or the shape of the world materializing under our very eyes? The objective signs should be sufficient to at least raise the necessary questions. Our pogroms and our crystalnachts are hidden away in clinics and hospitals. The people of the West are a nice people. An idealistic people. But note carefully the public rhetoric, note how the destruction of a child, the violation of conscience, the undermining of personal responsibility, the steady elimination of diversity, are lauded as steps in the protection of rights and freedoms. Have we reached that point to which Dawson, Pieper, Huxley, and Belloc referred? If it is true that rhetoric about freedom and democracy proliferates as the real thing declines, then the Western world has entered a period of institutionalized unreality.

http://www.studiobrien.com/the-new-totalitarianism/

Soft totalitarianism

Apr 4th, 2014

by Brett Stevens.

 

 

The most interesting aspect of the New Right is that, in following Vaclav Havel, it has diagnosed “soft totalitarianism”: the absolute state administered not by its police force, but by its citizens. Citizens turn each other in for rewards, whether official or simply social.

Soft social forces like this can work in a positive way. If there is a neighborhood pedophile, having people come together and remove that person is a benefit to all. However, we switched to organized government long ago because vigilante justice and mob retribution are too often misused or inaccurate, as happened in the Salem witch trial or when online user groups play detective.

In the case of soft totalitarianism however the subject matter is not something as natural as beating down predators. Rather it is the hunting down and elimination of all “politically incorrect” viewpoints. Consider the term “political correctness”: it literally means adjusting everything we say and do to fit with the political ideology of our time. It is the opposite of “think for yourself,” or even “think.” It is the jackboot slamming on the face of humanity, but within our own minds. Why enforce with police, or even courts, when you can get the population to panic instead and flee from any “bad” thoughts, flinging feces at the person implicated?

Soft totalitarianism succeeds because it taps into our instincts going back to our glorious Simian heritage. Monkeys live in “troops,” or small groups like tribes but less strictly associated with heritage. If one monkey comes down with a disease, the other monkeys will throw stones at it and drive it out of the troop. Thus in monkey society, the primary social concern is: where do I rank in the troop, aka how close am I to getting thrown out? Humans have adopted this into in-group/out-group logic within a modern society united by nothing but political-economic ideology; when people have nothing in common with each other, the instant the crowd turns on someone they will have no compunction about destroying that person.

And this requires zero intervention from government. It’s “freedom,” after all, to form a mob and go after people so long as you don’t literally murder them. This is what happened to Mozilla CEO Brendan Eich, who has driven out of the troop not for hating gays, but for not supporting gay marriage. He did nothing affirmative against gays; he denied that they should have a right historically extended to heterosexuals. The Crowd gathered and deposed him. From Mozilla’s press release:

Mozilla prides itself on being held to a different standard and, this past week, we didn’t live up to it. We know why people are hurt and angry, and they are right: it’s because we haven’t stayed true to ourselves.

We didn’t act like you’d expect Mozilla to act. We didn’t move fast enough to engage with people once the controversy started. We’re sorry. We must do better.

Brendan Eich has chosen to step down from his role as CEO. He’s made this decision for Mozilla and our community.

Mozilla believes both in equality and freedom of speech. Equality is necessary for meaningful speech. And you need free speech to fight for equality. Figuring out how to stand for both at the same time can be hard.

The rest is more of the same groveling.

What does soft totalitarianism mean?

First, it means that any dissent with be met with destruction of your livelihood. The only people with true free speech will be billionaires, because they do not require income. Anyone else who speaks up will be driven out of his job; anyone who aids him will be driven out of her job. Anyone who speaks up in her defense will be driven out of his job, in turn. You are the diseased monkey, and the only permissible act is to throw stones at you. We have un-done civilization itself and reverting to witch hunts and lynch mobs.

Second, it means that our society is entirely inwardly-focused. Those who can create things, like Brendan Eich who guided the development of JavaScript, are secondary to those with the right opinions. The resulting hybrid of corruption and ideological nepotism ensures that soon we will have Beautiful People in our elites everywhere, but that they will be useless. Sure, they can memorize instructions and repeat variations on actions from the past. That’s why they’re all so good at developing web apps despite the crushing tedium of doing so. But when it comes to making strategy decisions, or inventing actual new technology, they will be lost. We have replaced the innovators and their politically incorrect opinions with a herd of politically correct but fundamentally useless people.

If you wonder what brings down empires, it is this internal policing of reality. The Soviet Union fell because it was politically incorrect to say that fewer beets had been grown that what the Five Year Plan said should be grown, thus people simply lied. They faked it. Ancient Greece faded from history because they executed philosophers who spoke up for the truth when it was politically incorrect. Ancient Rome became decadent and unable to defend itself because of its own internal system of ideological nepotism based on praising Rome, rather than acknowledging its problems and fixing them. Those who spotted problems were attacked in a “kill the messenger” fashion. The same is true here.

Brendan Eich was a messenger for our society. He dared to differ from the herd on a few crucial points, and for one of those, they attempted to destroy him. When this sort of behavior becomes the norm, you have a society that insists on programming itself toward conformity and ignoring serious warnings about its socially-correct but realistically-incorrect ideals. At that point, the only missing ingredient is time, as the nation waits for the Vandals to finally appear and enforce the reality principle with swords and fire.

Posted in: Politics.

http://www.amerika.org/politics/soft-totalitarianism/

Remember: Do X! Don´t do Y!

Protect innocent, respect life, defend art, preserve creativity!

What´s Left? Antisemitism!

http://www.jsbielicki.com/jsb-79.htm

DJ Psycho Diver Sant – too small to fail
Tonttu Korvatunturilta Kuunsilta JSB
Tip tap tip tap tipetipe tip tap heija!
http://www.psychosputnik.com
http://www.saatchionline.com/jsbielicki
https://psychosputnik.wordpress.com/

They want 1984, we want 1776

They are on the run, we are on the march!

Dummheit ist, wenn jemand nicht weiß, was er wissen könnte.

Political correctness ist, wenn man aus Feigheit lügt, um Dumme nicht zu verärgern, die die Wahrheit nicht hören wollen.

“Im Streit um moralische Probleme, ist der Relativismus die erste Zuflucht der Schurken.“ Roger Scruton

Antisemitismus ist, wenn man Juden, Israel übelnimmt, was man anderen nicht übelnimmt.

Der Nicht-Antisemit ist ein Antisemit, der nach der derzeitigen deutschen Rechtsprechung, Israel, Juden diffamiert, diskriminiert, delegitimiert, jedoch nicht expressis verbis das Ziel der dritten Reichs, den Holocaust, die Judenvernichtung, befürwortet.

Islam ist weniger eine Religion und mehr eine totalitäre Gesellschaftsordnung, eine Ideologie, die absoluten Gehorsam verlangt und keinen Widerspruch, keinerlei Kritik duldet und das Denken und Erkenntnis verbietet. Der wahre Islam ist ganz anders, wer ihn findet wird eine hohe Belohnung erhalten.

Wahnsinn bedeute, immer wieder das gleiche zu tun, aber dabei stets ein anderes Resultat zu erwarten.

Gutmenschen sind Menschen, die gut erscheinen wollen, die gewissenlos das Gewissen anderer Menschen zu eigenen Zwecken mit Hilfe selbst inszenierter Empörungen instrumentalisieren.

Irritationen verhelfen zu weiteren Erkenntnissen, Selbstzufriedenheit führt zur Verblödung,

Wenn ein Affe denkt, „ich bin ein Affe“, dann ist es bereits ein Mensch.

Ein Mensch mit Wurzeln soll zur Pediküre gehen.

Wenn jemand etwas zu sagen hat, der kann es immer sehr einfach sagen. Wenn jemand nichts zu sagen hat, der sagt es dann sehr kompliziert.

Sucht ist, wenn jemand etwas macht, was er machen will und sucht jemand, der es macht, daß er es nicht macht und es nicht machen will.

Sollen die Klugen immer nachgeben, dann wird die Welt von Dummen regiert. Zu viel „Klugheit“ macht dumm.

Wenn man nur das Schlechte bekämpft, um das Leben zu schützen, bringt man gar nichts Gutes hervor und ein solches Leben ist dann nicht mehr lebenswert und braucht nicht beschützt zu werden, denn es ist dann durch ein solches totales Beschützen sowieso schon tot. Man kann so viel Geld für Versicherungen ausgeben, daß man gar nichts mehr zum Versichern hat. Mit Sicherheit ist es eben so.

Zufriedene Sklaven sind die schlimmsten Feinde der Freiheit.

Kreativität ist eine Intelligenz, die Spaß hat.

Wen die Arbeit krank macht, der soll kündigen!

Wenn Deutsche über Moral reden, meinen sie das Geld.

Ein Mensch ohne Erkenntnis ist dann  lediglich ein ängstlicher, aggressiver, unglücklicher Affe.

Denken ist immer grenzüberschreitend.

Der Mob, der sich das Volk nennt, diskutiert nicht, sondern diffamiert.

Legal ist nicht immer legitim.

Wer nicht verzichten kann, lebt unglücklich.

Sogenannte Sozial-, Kultur-, Geisteswissenschaften, Soziologie, Psychologie, Psychotherapie, Psychoanalyse, sind keine Wissenschaften mehr, sondern immanent religiöse Kultpropheten, organisiert wie Sekten.

Ohne eine starke Opposition atrophiert jede scheinbare Demokratie zur Tyrannei, und ebenso eine Wissenschaft, zur Gesinnung einer Sekte.

Man kann alles nur aus gewisser Distanz erkennen, wer sich ereifert, empört, wer mit seiner Nase an etwas klebt, der hat die Perspektive verloren, der erkennt nichts mehr, der hat nur noch seine Phantasie von der Welt im Kopf. So entsteht Paranoia, die sich Religion, und Religion als Politik, sogar als Wissenschaft nennt.

Islamisten sind eine Gefahr, deswegen werden sie als solche nicht gesehen. Juden sind keine Gefahr, deswegen werden sie als solche gesehen. So funktioniert die Wahrnehmung von  Feiglingen.

Humorlose Menschen könner nur fürchten oder hassen und werden Mönche oder Terroristen.

Menschen sind nicht gleich, jeder einzelne Mensch ist ein Unikat.

Erkenntnis gilt für alle, auch für Muslime, Albaner, Frauen und Homosexuelle.

Islam gehört zu Deutschland, Judentum gehört zu Israel.

Der Konsensterror (Totalitarismus) ist in Deutschland allgegenwärtig.

Es wird nicht mehr diskutiert, sondern nur noch diffamiert.

Es ist eine Kultur des Mobs. Wie es bereits gewesen ist.

Harmonie ist nur, wenn man nicht kommuniziert.

Man soll niemals mit jemand ins Bett gehen, der mehr Probleme hat, als man selbst.

>>Evelyn Waugh, sicherlich der witzigste Erzähler des vergangenen Jahrhunderts, im Zweiten Weltkrieg, herauskommend aus einem Bunker während einer deutschen Bombardierung Jugoslawiens, blickte zum Himmel, von dem es feindliche Bomben regnete und bemerkte: “Wie alles Deutsche, stark übertrieben.“<< Joseph Epstein

 

Man muß Mut haben, um witzig zu sein.

Dumm und blöd geht meistens zusammen.

Charlie Hebdo: solche Morde an Juden sind euch egal, mal sehen wie”angemessen”  ihr reagiert, wenn (wenn, nicht falls) eure Städte von Islamisten mit Kasam-Raketen beschossen werden.

Christopher Hitchens großartig: „In einer freien Gesellschaft hat niemand das Recht, nicht beleidigt zu werden.“

Je mehr sich jemand narzisstisch aufbläht, desto mehr fühlt er sich beleidigt und provoziert.

“Das Problem mit der Welt ist, daß die Dummen felsenfest überzeugt sind und die Klugen voller Zweifel.” – Bertrand Russel

Das Problem mit den Islamisten in Europa soll man genauso lösen, wie es Europa für den Nahen Osten verlangt: jeweils eine Zweistaatenlösung, die Hälfte für Muslime, die andere Hälfte für Nicht-Muslime, mit einer gemeinsamen Hauptstadt.

Was darf Satire? Alles! Nur nicht vom Dummkopf verstanden werden, weil es dann keine Satire war.

Islamimus ist Islam, der Gewalt predigt.

Islam ist eine Religion der Liebe,und wer es anzweifelt, ist tot.

Krieg ist Frieden. Freiheit ist Sklaverei. Unwissenheit ist Stärke. Der Islam ist die friedliche Religion der Liebe – George Orwell 2015

Islam ist verantwortlich für gar nichts, Juden sind schuld an allem.

Islamisten sind Satanisten. Islamismus ist eine Religion von Idioten.

Leute fühlen sich immer furchtbar beleidigt, wenn man ihre Lügen nicht glaubt.

Jeder ist selbst verantwortlich für seine Gefühle.

Die Psychoanalyse geht niemanden außer den Psychoanalytiker und seinen Patienten etwas an, und alle anderen sollen sich verpissen.

“Zeit ist das Echo einer Axt
im Wald. “
– Philip Larkin, Gesammelte Gedichte

Wenn jemand wie Islamisten sein Ego endlos aufbläht, dann verletzt er seine eigenen Gefühle schon morgens beim Scheißen.

„Die sieben Todsünden der modernen Gesellschaft: Reichtum ohne Arbeit, Genuß ohne Gewissen, Wissen ohne Charakter, Geschäft ohne Moral, Wissenschaft ohne Menschlichkeit, Religion ohne Opfer, Politik ohne Prinzipien.“
―Mahatma Gandhi

„Wo man nur die Wahl hat zwischen Feigheit und Gewalt, würde ich zur Gewalt raten.“
―Mahatma Gandhi

Warum zeigt sich Allah nicht? Weil er mit solchen Arschlöchern nichts zu tun haben will.

„Wenn der Faschismus wiederkehrt, wird er nicht sagen: ‚Ich bin der Faschismus’. Nein, er wird sagen: ‚Ich bin der Antifaschismus’.”  – Ignazio Silone

Politische Korrektheit verlangt eine Sprache für ein Poesiealbum.

Psychoanalyse ist frivol, oder es ist keine Psychoanalyse.

Bunte Vielfalt, früher: Scheiße

Was der Mensch nicht mehr verändern, nicht mehr reformieren kann, ist nicht mehr lebendig, sondern sehr tot. Was tot ist, das soll man, das muß man begraben: Religion, Ehe, Romantizismus, etc.

Romantik ist scheiße.

Die Realität ist immer stärker als Illusionen.

Ein Wahn zeichnet sich durch zunehmenden Realitätsverlust, und das kann man den heute Regierenden in Deutschland und deren Massenmedien attestieren.

Realitätsverlust beschreibt den geistigen Zustand einer Person, welche nicht (mehr) in der Lage ist, die Situation, in der sie sich befindet, zu begreifen. Ihr werdet also von Wahnsinnigen regiert und durch deren Massenmedien manipuliert.

Der Totalitarismus kann nur besiegt werden kann, wenn man den Mut hat, die Dinge beim richtigen Namen zu nennen, so wie sie sind. Politischen Korrektheit verhindert es, fördert den Totalitarismus und ist politische Feigheit und politische Lüge.

Die Auslöschung: Islam ist wie die Sonne, wer ihm zu nahe kommt, der verbrennt darin selbst und fackelt den Rest der Welt mit ab.

Islam will keine Unterwerfung! Islam will Sieg, Vernichtung und Auslöschung.

Die Welt wurde nicht nur für dich alleine erschaffen.

Zeit braucht Zeit.

Was hat Gott mit uns vor, wenn er dem Teufel immer mehr Territorien freiräumt?

Es ist nicht die größte Angst, wenn man in einen Abgrund schaut, sondern zu merken, daß der Abgrund zurückschaut.

Ich ist anders.

Muslima mit Kopftuch nerven weniger, als deutsche Mütter mit ihren Kinderwagen.

Prothesen-Menschen – sehen aus wie Frau und Mann, sind aber keine.

Global Governance – der politische Reparaturbetrieb, fängt an zu reparieren, bevor etwas entstanden ist.

Das extrem gesteigerte, angeblich kritische, tatsächlich dämonisierende, Interesse der Deutschen an Israel und Juden ist pervers.

Helden von heute wissen nichts, können nichts und wollen nichts. Sie schauen einfach wie Helden aus, das ist alles.

Mag sein, daß früher Väter ihre Kinder gefressen haben. Heute fressen die Mütter alles, Väter, Kinder und den Rest.  Alles Mutti, irgendwie!

Deutschland gestern: der Wille zur Macht.
Deutschland heute: der Wille zur Verblendung.
Deutschland morgen: 德國

Deutsche Psychoanalyse? Großartig, wie deutscher Charme, deutscher Humor und deutscher Esprit.

Der Widerstand fängt mit einer eigenen, anderen Sprache als die der Diktatur.

Smart phones for stupid people.

Ein Linker kann, muß aber nicht dumm sein.

Wenn man ganzen Staaten nicht übel nimmt, wenn sie mit Millionen Opfern Selbstmord begehen, warum dann einem Co-Piloten mit 149 Toten?

Nur die Reinheit der Mittel heiligt den Zweck.

Ein extremer Narzißt ist ein potentieller Terrorist, und jeder Terrorist ist ein extremer Narzißt.

Islamisierung bedeutet Verblödung.

Copy-shop als psychoanalytische Methode heute.

 

Die Psychoanalyse heute ist lediglich die Nachahmung einer vermeintlichen Psychoanalyse, die es so nie gegeben hat, also unbewußte Karikatur, Totemmaske ihrer selbst.

 

Die Revolution frißt ihre Väter, nicht ihre Kinder.

 

Jeder verdient eine zweite Chance. Eine zweite, nicht eine zwölfte, zweiundzwanzigste oder einhundertzweite.

 

In Polen haben amerikanische Geheimdienstler ihre Gefangenen gefoltert, während vor polnischen Gerichten Prozesse gegen polnische Geheimdienstler liefen, die Gefangene gefoltert haben.

 

Besser irgendwelche Sitten, als gar keine Sitten.

 

Reale Gewalt gegen strukturelle Gewalt – lediglich eine Rationalisierung der eigenen Lust als Rechtfertigung für eigene wilde, triebhaften Gewalt.

 

National Sozialistische Deutsche Arbeiter Partei (NSDAP) war links,, ihr Kampf gegen Kommunisten und Sozialisten war nicht ideologisch, sondern es war ein Konkurrenzkampf unter Gleichen.

 

Der Mensch – ein Kopierfehler.

Das Leben ist kein Mittel zu irgendeinem Zweck. Der Mensch soll keinen Nutzen für jemanden haben, sonst ist er kein Mensch mehr, nicht mal ein Rindvieh, sondern eine Art Frikadelle.

 

 

Stupidity is demonstrated by people lacking the knowledge they could achieve

Political correctness can be defined as the telling of a lie out of the cowardice in an attempt to avoid upsetting fools not willing to face up to the truth

“In arguments about moral problems, relativism is the first refuge of the scoundrel.” Roger Scruton

Antisemitism is when one blames the Jews or Israel for issues, he does not blame others

Islam is less a religion and more a totalitarian society, an ideology that demands absolute obedience and tolerates no dissent, no criticism, and prohibits the thinking, knowledge and recognition. True Islam is totally different, the one who will find it will receive a very high reward.

Craziness is, when one always does the same but expects a different outcome

If a monkey thinks “I am a monkey”, then it is already a human

A man with roots should go for a pedicure

Self smugness leads to idiocy, being pissed off leads to enlightenment

If someone has something to say, he can tell it always very easily. If someone has nothing to say, he says it in a very complicated way

Addiction is, when somebody does something he wants to do, yet seeks someone who can make it so he won’t do it and doesn’t want to, either.

If the clever people always gave in, the world would be reigned by idiots. Too much “cleverness” makes you stupid.

If one only fights evil to protect life, one produces nothing good at all and such a life then becomes no longer worth living and thus requires no protection, for it is already unlived due to such a total protection. One can spend so much money on insurance, that one has nothing left to insure. Safety works in the same way.

Happy slaves are the worst enemies of freedom.

Creativity is an intelligence having fun.

If working makes you sick, fuck off, leave the work!

If Germans talk about morality, they mean money.

A man without an insight is just an anxious, aggressive, unhappy monkey.

Thinking is always trespassing.

The mob, who calls himself the people, does not discuss, just defames.

Legal is not always legitimate.

Who can not do without, lives unhappy.

So called social, culture sciences, sociology, psychology psychotherapy, psychoanalysis, are not anymore scientific, but immanent religious cult-prophets, organized as sects.

Without a strong opposition any apparent democracy atrophies to a tyranny, and as well a science , to an attitude of a religious sect.

You can recognize everything from a certain distance only, who is zealous, outraged, who sticks his nose in something, this one has lost the perspective, he recognizes anything more, he has only his imagination of the world in his head. This creates paranoia, which is called religion, and a religion as politics, even as a science.

Islamists are a real danger, therefore they will not be seen as such. Jews are not a danger, therefore they are seen as such. It is how the perception by cowards functions.

People without a sense of humor are able only to fear or to hate and become monks or terrorists.

People are not equal, each single person is unique.

Insight applies to everyone, including Muslims, Albanians, women and homosexuals.

Islam belongs to Germany, Judaism belongs to Israel.

The totalitarian Terror of consensus is ubiquitous in Germany.
There are no discussions anymore, but defamations only.
It is a culture of the mob. As it has already been.
Harmony is only if you do not communicate.

One should never go to bed with someone who has more problems than you already have.

>>Evelyn Waugh, surely the wittiest novelist of the past century, in World War II, coming out of a bunker during a German bombing of Yugoslavia, looked up at the sky raining enemy bombs and remarked, “Like everything German, vastly overdone.”<< Joseph Epstein

One has to be brave, to have a wit.

Stupid and dull belong mostly together.

Charlie Hebdo: you don´t care if such murders are comitted to Jews, we will see how “adequate” you will react when (when, not if), Islamists will begin to bombard your cities with Kasam missiles.

Christopher Hitchens: “In a free society, no one has the right not to be offended.“

The more someone narcissistic inflates , the more he feels insulted and provoked.

“The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt.” – Bertrand Russell

The problem with the Islamists in Europe should be solved exactly as Europe requires to the Middle East: a two-state solution, a half for muslims and the another half for not-muslims, with a common capital.

What may satire? Everything! Except be understood by the fool, because then it was not a satire.

Islamimus is Islam preaching violence.

Islam is a religion of love, and he who doubts is dead.

War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength. Islam is a peaceful religion of love – George Orwell 2015

Islam is not responsible for anything, Jews are guilty of everything.

Islamists are satanists. Islamism is a religion of idiots.

People feel always terrible offended if you do not believe their lies.

 

Everyone is responsible for his feelings.

 

Psychoanalysis is nobody’s business except the psychoanalyst and his patient, and everybody else can fuck off.

 

“Time is the echo of an axe
Within a wood.”
― Philip Larkin, Collected Poems

If someone inflates endless his ego, as Islamists do, then he hurts his own feelings already in his morning own shit.

“The seven deadly sins of modern society: wealth without work, pleasure without conscience, knowledge without character, business without morality, science without humanity, worship without sacrifice, politics without principles”
-Mahatma Gandhi

“Where there is only a choice between cowardice and violence, I would advise to choose the violence.”
-Mahatma Gandhi

 Why Allah does not shows himself? Because he does not want  to do anything with such assholes.

 

“When fascism returns, he will not say, ‘I am the fascism‘. No, he will say, ‘I am the anti-fascism “– Ignazio Silone.

 

Political correctness requires a language for a poetry album.

 

Psychoanalysis is frivolous, or it is not psychoanalysis.

Colorful diversity, earlier: shit.

 

What can not any longer be changed, can not any longer be reformed, it is no longer alive, but very dead (instead). What is dead should be, has to be buried: religion, marriage, Romanticism, etc.

 

Romantic sucks.

 

 The reality is always stronger than illusions.

 

 A delusion is characterized by increasing loss of reality, and can be attested to today’s leaders in Germany and the mass media.Loss of reality describes the mental state of a person who is not (any longer) be able to understand the situation in which it is located. So you are ruled by madmen and manipulated by the mass media.

 

Totalitarianism can only be defeated if one has the courage to call things by their right names, just as they are. Political correctness prevents it, promotes totalitarianism and political cowardice and political lie.

 

The Extinction: Islam is like the sun, who comes too close to him, will burn itself and will flare the rest of the world with him.

 

Islam does not want any submission! Islam wants victory, destruction and annihilation.

 

The world was not created just for you only.

 

Time needs time.

 

What has God with us when he freely admits the devil more and more territories?

 

It’s not the biggest fear when you look into an abyss, but to note that the abyss looks back at you.

 

I is different.

 

Muslim´s headscarf is less annoying than German mothers with their pushchairs.

 

Prostheses people – look like women and men, but they are not.

 

Global governance – the political repair operation begins to repair before something was created.

 

The extremely increased, ostensibly critical, actually demonizing, German interest in Israel and Jews is perverse.

 

The Non–anti-Semite is by the current German law an anti-Semite who defames, discriminates, delegitimizes Israel, Jews, , but do not supports expressis verbis the aim of the Third Reich, the Holocaust, the extermination of the Jews.

Heroes of today know nothing, can not and do not want anything. They just look like heroes, that’s all.

It may be that early fathers ate their children. Today, the mothers will eat anything, fathers, children and the rest. Everything Mommy, anyway!

Germany yesterday: the will to power.
Germany today: the will to blindness.
Germany tomorrow: 德國

German psychoanalysis? Great, like German charm, German humor and German wit.

The resistance starts with its own language other than that of the dictatorship.

Smart phones for stupid people.

A leftist can, but do not have to be stupid.

If you do not blame states, when they commit suicide with millions victims , so why to blame a co-pilot with 149 dead?

Only the purity of the means justify the end.

An extreme narcissist is a potential terrorist, and every terrorist is an extreme narcissist.

 

Islamization means dementia.

 

Copy-shop as a psychoanalytic method today.

 

Psychoanalysis today is merely an imitation of a putative psychoanalysis, it has never existed, an unconscious cartoon, totem mask of itself.

 

The revolution devours its fathers, not its children.

Everyone deserves a second chance. A second, not a twelfth, twenty-second or one hundred second.

In Poland, American intelligence officials  have tortured their prisoners, while the Polish courts ran trials of Polish intelligence officers who tortured prisoners.

Better have any manners, than no manners at all.

 

Realistic violence against structural violence – only a rationalization of their own desire as justification for their own wild, instinctual violence.

 

National Socialists German Worker Party (NSDAP) was left, its fight against communists and socialists was not ideological, but it was a competition among equals.

 

 The man – a copy error.

 

Life is not a mean for any purpose. If a  man has a benefit for someone else, he is no longer a man, not even an ass, but a kind of meatball.

Facts and myths on Ferguson, directly from Washington (Sunderland) / german-english

Facts and myths on Ferguson, directly from Washington (Sunderland)

Listen here to the full statement of the investigation:

Will man dem täglichen Lamentieren und Jammern der deutschen Staatsmedien entgehen, empfiehlt es sich das Radio Newcastle zu hören, informativ, interessant und gutgelaunt:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcnewcastle

Und wenn dort von Washington die Rede ist, dann wird es meistens Washington in County Durham in der Nähe von Newcastle sein, a City of Sunderland in Tyne and Wear, England.

Schwarz auf schwarz

Von Paul Nellen, 03.12.2014

Ferguson, USA – ein jugendlicher Schwarzer stirbt durch die Kugel eines weißen Polizisten. Das Urteil steht in Deutschland damit schon fest: der 18-jährige Michael Brown ist ein typisches Opfer des typischen weißen US-Rassismus geworden, der alltäglich auf Amerikas Straßen einen hohen Blutzoll hauptsächlich unter Afro-Americans fordert. Weiße Kugeln, schwarzes Blut! Ist das so?

Leider – oder besser: gottseidank! – ist dieses Bild komplett falsch. Vorausgesetzt, man vertraut den offiziellen Erkenntnissen der US-Regierung.

Überraschenderweise ist das US-Justizministerium nämlich schon vor drei Jahren zu einem gänzlich anderen Ergebnis gekommen. Es steht in einem offiziellen Bericht des Ministeriums vom Nov. 2011, auf die sich auch New Yorks Ex-Bürgermeister Rudy Giuliani kürzlich auf CNN bezog und der dort Ferguson zu einer “Ausnahme” erklärte:

http://edition.cnn.com/2014/11/23/politics/rudy-giuliani-ferguson-exception/

Die Statistik der Tötungsdelikte sagt nämlich klipp und klar, dass es meistens schwarze Kugeln sind, die Schwarze treffen: “93% of black victims were killed by blacks”.

Quelle: Homicide Trends in the United States, 1980-2008 Annual Rates for 2009 and 2010. Hg.: U.S. Dpt. of Justice, Nov. 2011, S. 13

http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/htus8008.pdf

Auch diese Mordopfer sind zu betrauern, ihre Mörder zu bestrafen. Unser Vorurteil vom “rassistischen Mord-Amerika” dagegen gilt es zu begraben. Aber keine Sorge, es gibt noch viel zu tun. Gegen die Chlorhühnchen werden noch Unterschriften gesucht!

http://www.achgut.com/dadgdx/index.php/dadgd/article/schwarz_auf_schwarz

Facts and myths on Ferguson, directly from Washington (Sunderland)

Listen here to the full statement of the investigation:

If you want to get rid of the daily moaning and whining of the German State media, then listen instead to the radio Newcastle, informative, interesting and bright:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcnewcastle

And if they talk there about Washington, then it is usually Washington in County Durham nearby the city of Newcastle, a city of Sunderland in Tyne and Wear, England.

Black on black

By Paul Nellen, 03/12/2014
Ferguson, United States – a young black dies by the bullet of a white police officer. The verdict is in Germany so certain: the 18-year-old Michael Brown has become a typical victim of the typical white American racism. Bullets, black blood! Is that so?
Unfortunately – or rather, thank God! – This is completely wrong. Assuming you trust the official findings of the US government.
Surprisingly, the US Department of Justice is in fact came to a completely different conclusion three years ago. It is an official report of the Ministry dating from November:
http://edition.cnn.com/2014/11/23/politics/rudy-giuliani-ferguson-exception/
The statistics of homicides says it clearly that it are mostly black bullets, which hit the black: „93% of black victims were killed by blacks.“
Source: Homicide Trends in the United States, 1980-2008 Annual Council for 2009 and 2010. Ed .: US Dpt. of Justice, November 2011, pp 13
http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/htus8008.pdf
These are murder victims to mourn, to punish their murderers. Our prejudice of „racist murder-America“, however, is to be buried. But do not worry, there’s still plenty to do. Signatures are still being sought against the chlorine chicken!
http://www.achgut.com/dadgdx/index.php/dadgd/article/schwarz_auf_schwarz

Ferguson an exception as ‚93% of blacks are killed by other blacks,‘ Giuliani says

By Sara Fischer, CNN

November 24, 2014

Washington (CNN) — Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani says the controversy surrounding the death of 18-year-old Michael Brown, who was fatally shot by a white police officer in Ferguson, Missouri, does not exemplify a larger national problem.

„93 percent of blacks are killed by other blacks,“ Giuliani said on NBC’s „Meet the Press.“ „We’re talking about the exception here.“

„What about the poor black child that is killed by the other black child? Why aren’t you protesting that?“

In a heated exchange Sunday with academic and radio host Michael Eric Dyson, Giuliani suggested that the white police officer who fatally shot Brown in mid-August shouldn’t be the focus of the nation’s attention.

„We are talking about the significant exception,“ Giuliani said. „I’d like to see the attention paid to that, that you are paying to this.“

Giuliani went on to explain that he and other New York City mayors have worked hard to make New York Police Department „as proportionate“ as possible to reflect the racial makeup of the city.

In response, Dyson called Giuliani’s comparison „a false equivalency.“

Giuliani says the chaos signifies that the nation is focusing on racial disparity when it should be setting its attention on the way the police force is arranged in respect to high crime rates.

„Why don’t you cut it down so that so many white police officers don’t have to be in black areas?“

„White police officers wouldn’t be there if you (speaking to Dyson) weren’t killing each other 75% of the time.“

The former New York mayor, who has been credited with greatly reducing crime in the Big Apple among poorer areas, insisted that the focus of the nation should pivot towards reducing crime among the black community.

„(Crime) is hardly insignificant,“ Giuliani said. „It is the reason for the heavy police presence in the black community.“

Giuliani received significant blow-back from Dyson, an African America who told Giuliani his remarks „reinforce the problematic perspective that prevails in the culture.“

Complete coverage of what’s happening in Ferguson

http://www.theroot.com/articles/culture/2014/11/st_louis_prosecutor_says_key_witnesses_flip_flopped_and_said_michael_brown.html

St. Louis Prosecutor: Key Witnesses Flip-Flopped

St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney Robert McCulloch said that the most “credible” and “reliable” eyewitnesses all came to support Officer Darren Wilson’s claim that he shot Michael Brown in self-defense.

During St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney Robert P. McCulloch’s press conference Monday night, during which he explained why a Missouri grand jury decided not to indict police Officer Darren Wilson for fatally shooting Michael Brown, McCulloch made shocking revelations about the testimony of some of the key witnesses.

“The most credible eyewitnesses to the shooting death of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo., said he had charged toward police Officer Darren Wilson just before the final, fatal shots, the St. Louis County prosecutor said Monday night,” the New York Times explained.

That kind of testimony flies in the face of the accounts given by several eyewitnesses who spoke to news organizations immediately after Brown’s shooting in August: that Brown had his hands up in the air, seemingly surrendering, as Wilson continued shooting. Apparently some of those witnesses changed their stories about what happened, or their version of events didn’t match up with the physical evidence.

“The accounts of several other witnesses from the Ferguson neighborhood where Mr. Brown, 18 and unarmed, met his death on Aug. 9—including those who said Mr. Brown was trying to surrender—changed over time or were inconsistent with physical evidence, the prosecutor, Robert P. McCulloch, said,” the Times continued.

More than half of the 12 individuals who made up the grand jury supported Wilson’s claims that he fatally shot Brown in self-defense.

“The fact that at least nine members of the 12-member panel could not agree to indict the officer indicates that they accepted the narrative of self-defense put forth by Officer Wilson in his voluntary, four hours of testimony before the grand jury,” the Times reports.

McCulloch said that the “most reliable” eyewitness accounts also supported Wilson’s version of events.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/25/us/witnesses-told-grand-jury-that-michael-brown-charged-at-darren-wilson-prosecutor-says.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=a-lede-package-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=1

Witnesses Told Grand Jury That Michael Brown Charged at Darren Wilson, Prosecutor Says

St. Louis County prosecutor announced the decision of a grand jury not to indict Darren Wilson, the white police officer who fatally shot Michael Brown, an unarmed black teenager, in Ferguson, Mo.

The most credible eyewitnesses to the shooting death of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo., said he had charged toward Police Officer Darren Wilson just before the final, fatal shots, the St. Louis County prosecutor said Monday night as he sought to explain why a grand jury had not found probable cause to indict the officer.

The accounts of several other witnesses from the Ferguson neighborhood where Mr. Brown, 18 and unarmed, met his death on Aug. 9 — including those who said Mr. Brown was trying to surrender — changed over time or were inconsistent with physical evidence, the prosecutor, Robert P. McCulloch, said in a news conference.

“The duty of the grand jury is to separate fact and fiction,” he said in a statement watched by a tense nation. “No probable cause exists to file any charges against Darren Wilson.”

Mr. McCulloch praised the grand jurors, who met on 25 days over a three-month period and heard 60 witnesses, for pouring “their hearts and souls into this process” and said that only by hearing all the evidence, as they had, could one fairly judge the case.

The task facing the St. Louis County grand jury was not to determine whether Officer Darren Wilson was guilty of a crime, but whether there was evidence to justify bringing charges, which could have ranged from negligent manslaughter to intentional murder.

The fact that at least nine members of the 12-member panel could not agree to indict the officer indicates that they accepted the narrative of self-defense put forth by Officer Wilson in his voluntary, four hours of testimony before the grand jury. Mr. McCulloch, in his summary of the months of testimony, said it was supported by the most reliable eyewitness accounts — from African-Americans in the vicinity of the shooting — as well as physical evidence and the consistent results of three autopsies.

From Page 34 of Officer Wilson’s Testimony

At this point it looked like he was almost bulking up to run through the shots, like it was making him mad that I’m shooting at him.

And the face that he had was looking straight through me, like I wasn’t even there, I wasn’t even anything in his way.

View annotated transcript of Officer Wilson’s Testimony »

At issue, under the Missouri law governing use of deadly force by law enforcement as well as general rules for self-defense, was if Officer Wilson “reasonably believed” that he or others were in serious danger.

According to transcripts released Monday night, Officer Wilson testified that after he encountered Mr. Brown and a friend walking in the street, he realized the pair might be those being sought for stealing cigarillos from a convenience store minutes earlier.

According to witnesses and blood and other evidence found inside the car, Officer Wilson first fired two shots while he struggled with Mr. Brown through the window of his patrol vehicle, a Chevrolet Tahoe, grazing Mr. Brown’s hand.

Mr. Brown started to run away, with Officer Wilson in chase, then stopped and turned. According to the prosecutor’s summary, the officer fired five shots as Mr. Brown charged him, then another five shots as he made what one witness called a “full charge.”

Full Qustions and Answers »

1 As news of the decision spread, protesters surged forward, throwing objects at officers in riot gear. The sound of gunfire could be heard. 2 Police officers used tear gas and smoke to disperse people who were hurling rocks and breaking the windows of parked police cruisers. A vehicle was set on fire. 3 At least a dozen buildings were set on fire around the city, many in the vicinity of Ferguson Market and Liquor, the store Michael Brown was in before he was killed by Officer Wilson.

Only 90 seconds passed between Officer Wilson’s first encounter with the youths and the arrival of a backup police car, just after the shooting stopped, the prosecutor said.

Probable cause is not a stiff standard. It does not require that most of the evidence be incriminating, let alone be proof “beyond a reasonable doubt,” as required in a criminal trial. Instead, grand juries are ordinarily instructed to issue an indictment when there is “some evidence” of guilt, legal experts said.

To Mr. Brown’s parents and their supporters, the case for bringing at least some charge in this case seemed open and shut. But the jurors also had to consider whether Officer Wilson acted within the limits of the lethal-force law, raising the threshold for an indictment.

Independent legal experts said it was impossible to analyze the grand jury decision without studying the transcripts of the testimony as well as the police reports, autopsies and forensic evidence that might shed light on what Mr. Brown was doing in his final seconds: whether he was menacing the officer or, as a friend who was with him said, trying to surrender.

Some people claiming to be eyewitnesses said Mr. Brown was shot in the back, Mr. McCulloch said, but later changed their stories when autopsies found no injuries entering his back. But others, African-Americans who did not speak out publicly, he said, consistently said that the youth had menaced the officer.

Mr. McCulloch, had promised that he would allay any suspicions about the fairness of the proceedings by releasing, with names redacted, transcripts of testimony and other evidence heard by the panel.

The release of grand jury information, secret by law, is rare, and Mr. McCulloch originally said he would first seek a judge’s permission. But on Monday, his office said it had determined that it had a right to release most of the transcripts and it did so Monday night.

The grand jury, which included three African-Americans, deliberated for two days. By law, the final vote on whether to bring an indictment is secret and the jurors are legally prohibited from discussing their deliberations.

The United States Department of Justice is conducting a separate investigation of whether Officer Wilson, who is white, intentionally acted to deprive Mr. Brown, an African-American, of his civil rights. But the bar for such cases is a high one, and officials have privately said they are unlikely to bring federal charges. The Justice Department is also conducting a broader investigation into the practices of the Ferguson Police Department.

A version of this article appears in print on November 25, 2014, on page A18 of the New York edition with the headline: Witnesses Told Grand Jury That Teenager Charged at Officer.

Remember: Do X! Don´t do Y!

Protect innocent, respect life, defend art, preserve creativity!

What´s Left? Antisemitism!

http://www.jsbielicki.com/jsb-79.htm

DJ Psycho Diver Sant – too small to fail
Tonttu Korvatunturilta Kuunsilta JSB
Tip tap tip tap tipetipe tip tap heija!
http://www.psychosputnik.com
http://www.saatchionline.com/jsbielicki
https://psychosputnik.wordpress.com/

They want 1984, we want 1776

They are on the run, we are on the march!

Dummheit ist, wenn jemand nicht weiß, was er wissen könnte.

Political correctness ist, wenn man aus Feigheit lügt, um Dumme nicht zu verärgern, die die Wahrheit nicht hören wollen.

“Im Streit um moralische Probleme, ist der Relativismus die erste Zuflucht der Schurken.“ Roger Scruton

Antisemitismus ist, wenn man Juden, Israel übelnimmt, was man anderen nicht übelnimmt.

Islam ist weniger eine Religion und mehr eine totalitäre Gesellschaftsordnung, eine Ideologie, die absoluten Gehorsam verlangt und keinen Widerspruch, keinerlei Kritik duldet und das Denken und Erkenntnis verbietet. Der wahre Islam ist ganz anders, wer ihn findet wird eine hohe Belohnung erhalten.

Wahnsinn bedeute, immer wieder das gleiche zu tun, aber dabei stets ein anderes Resultat zu erwarten

Gutmenschen sind Menschen, die gut erscheinen wollen, die gewissenlos das Gewissen anderer Menschen zu eigenen Zwecken mit Hilfe selbst inszenierter Empörungen instrumentalisieren

Irritationen verhelfen zu weiteren Erkenntnissen, Selbstzufriedenheit führt zur Verblödung

Wenn ein Affe denkt, „ich bin ein Affe“, dann ist es bereits ein Mensch

Ein Mensch mit Wurzeln soll zur Pediküre gehen

Wenn jemand etwas zu sagen hat, der kann es immer sehr einfach sagen. Wenn jemand nichts zu sagen hat, der sagt es dann sehr kompliziert

Sucht ist, wenn jemand etwas macht, was er machen will und sucht jemand, der es macht, daß er es nicht macht und es nicht machen will.

Sollen die Klugen immer nachgeben, dann wird die Welt von Dummen regiert. Zu viel „Klugheit“ macht dumm.

Wenn man nur das Schlechte bekämpft, um das Leben zu schützen, bringt man gar nichts Gutes hervor und ein solches Leben ist dann nicht mehr lebenswert und braucht nicht beschützt zu werden, denn es ist dann durch ein solches totales Beschützen sowieso schon tot. Man kann so viel Geld für Versicherungen ausgeben, daß man gar nichts mehr zum Versichern hat. Mit Sicherheit ist es eben so.

Zufriedene Sklaven sind die schlimmsten Feinde der Freiheit.

Kreativität ist eine Intelligenz, die Spaß hat.

Stupidity is demonstrated by people lacking the knowledge they could achieve

Political correctness can be defined as the telling of a lie out of the cowardice in an attempt to avoid upsetting fools not willing to face up to the truth

“In arguments about moral problems, relativism is the first refuge of the scoundrel.” Roger Scruton

Antisemitism is when one blames the Jews or Israel for issues, he does not blame others

Islam is less a religion and more a totalitarian society, an ideology that demands absolute obedience and tolerates no dissent, no criticism, and prohibits the thinking, knowledge and recognition. True Islam is totally different, the one who will find it will receive a very high reward.

Craziness is, when one always does the same but expects a different outcome

If a monkey thinks “I am a monkey”, then it is already a human

A man with roots should go for a pedicure

Self smugness leads to idiocy, being pissed off leads to enlightenment

If someone has something to say, he can tell it always very easily. If someone has nothing to say, he says it in a very complicated way

Addiction is, when somebody does something he wants to do, yet seeks someone who can make it so he won’t do it and doesn’t want to, either.

If the clever people always gave in, the world would be reigned by idiots. Too much “cleverness” makes you stupid.

If one only fights evil to protect life, one produces nothing good at all and such a life then becomes no longer worth living and thus requires no protection, for it is already unlived due to such a total protection. One can spend so much money on insurance, that one has nothing left to insure. Safety works in the same way.

Happy slaves are the worst enemies of freedom.

Creativity is an intelligence, which has fun.

Alex Jones über soziale Atrophie / Alex Jones on Social Atrophy (german / english)

Alex Jones über soziale Atrophie[1]

Legende:

VO = Voiceover

AJ = Alex Jones

CA = Anrufer

s.l. = klingt wie

 

VO:     Big Brother, Massenmedien, Vertuschungen der Regierung. Sie suchen antworten? Er auch. Sein Name ist Alex Jones des GCN Radio Netzwerks. Und nun, live aus Austin Texas, Alex Jones.

 

AJ:      Unsere Reporter sind vor Ort in Ferguson, Missouri, welches nun die internationalen Nachrichten dominiert und androht die gesamte Nation in weiteren Aufständen und Plünderungen einzuhüllen. Wir streben hier danach objektiv zu erklären, dass der Polizei-Staat wirklich niemandem dient, außer den Globalisten, welche diese Nation überfallen haben. Zumindest soweit keine Bösewichte aus St. Louis ins Ferguson Gebiet kommen, um zu provozieren. Es gibt die neuen Black Panthers, welche zur Gewalt aufrufen. Wir haben Berichte unserer Reporter, welche Angriffe mit Molotov Cocktails und Schusswaffen bestätigen. Daher gerieten die Bullen außer Rand und Band und fingen damit an, jeden zu attackieren, einschließlich die Reporter. Dann hatten die eine Presse-Konferenz spät in der Nacht in der ernsthaft vermittelt wurde, und ich zitiere, „Tja, wer keine $50.000 Kamera benutzt und in einem News-Van da ist, von dem wissen wir nicht, ob sie wirklich Berichterstatter sind.“

Das steht also an. Unsere Reporter waren zwar auch bei dieser Presse-Konferenz, Joe Biggs zum Beispiel, direkt neben dem Sprecher der Staats-Polizei, jedoch wurden unsere sehr ernsten Fragen völlig ignoriert. Das also gleich. Offensichtlich verschlechtert sich die Lage schnell, doch wir müssen uns auch den all den anderen Nachrichten widmen. Die offenen Grenzen, die Kriege welche die Globalisten anzetteln, die Entstabilisierung im Nahen Osten und die angehende Abwertung des Dollars und wir haben bis zur dritten Stunde der Sendung keine Gastauftritte, dann wird die Best-Seller Autorin des Buchs „Police State USA: How Orwell’s Nightmare is Becoming our Reality“ (by Cheryl K. Chumley) bei uns sein. Wir führen und verkaufen dieses Buch, welches übrigens so informativ ist, dass ich tatsächlich Neues darin gelernt habe. Dabei möchte ich nicht arrogant klingen. Ich bin vermutlich der leitende Experte, wenn es darum geht, wie der Polizeistaat tatsächlich funktioniert. Einfach, da ich die Rand Corportation Dokumente und die Pentagon Unterlagen fast zwei Jahrzehnte gelesen und studiert habe. Ich war schon einige Jahre auf Sendung, als mir das klar wurde, also etwa 18 Jahre. Ihr Buch ist stark, da sie eine bekannte Journalistin ist, welche eine tiefgründige Studie der aktuellen Geschehnisse durchgeführt hat. Sie wird sich uns also anschließen, um den Polizeistaat zu besprechen, welcher die Menschen endlich beschäftigt.

 

Wenn wir vom Polizeistaat sprechen, dann ist der umgangssprachliche Unterton, die Abneigung gegenüber der Polizei, denn so werden die Menschen programmiert.. Damit, wenn jemand vom Polizeistaat spricht, gesagt wird, warum? Magst Du die Polizei nicht? Nein, was wir nicht mögen, ist in einer Mischung aus Nord-Korea und Drittem Reich mit einer Note von Mexiko, Guatemala und Nigeria zu leben. Wer wohnt, wo es Panzer und maskierte Polizisten in paramilitärischer Uniform gibt, der wohnt in einem dritte-Welt Land, einer instabilen Jauchengrube. Wenn die mit Schallkanonen und Gummigeschossen und dem ganzen Mist herumfahren, ist das ein Zeichen dafür, dass dieses Land in großen Schwierigkeiten steckt. Nebst unseren riesigen, unhaltbaren und arglistigen Schulden, nebst der Spionage der NSA, nebst dem als Diktator agierendem Präsidenten, diese Nation ist ein Schlamassel. Es gibt bei uns Militärpolizei und militarisierte Polizei, welchen sich nun die Nationalgarde angeschlossen hat. Die Zielen ihre Knarren nun seit zwei, bald drei Wochen auf unsere Reporter und benehmen sich äußerst aggressiv und scheinen voller Hass zu sein. Selbst im Falle einer besetzenden Arme wäre dies keine gute Lage. Es würde mehr Widerstand kosten, wodurch klar wird, dass das ganze Training dem perfekten Sturm reiner Havarie dient.

 

Dazu also gleich mehr und dann zu Gast, Cheryl Chumley, „Police State USA“. Ich habe mir vorgenommen, die Leitungen früh in der ersten Stunde zu öffnen und viele Anrufe entgegenzunehmen. In der ersten Stunde nur für neue Anrufer und dann weit offen in der zweiten Stunde und dann kommen wir zu unserem Gast. Das alles gibt es heute. Infowars.com Prisonplanet.com sind unsere Webseiten.

 

Aus Austin Texas sind wir sind nun weltweit live auf Sendung. Unsere Reporter berichten nun in der zweiten Woche aus Ferguson, Missouri darüber, was eine Vorführung des nationalen Polizeistaates ist. Unsere Reporter haben Videoaufnahmen davon, wie Journalisten von angeblichen „perfekten Engeln“-Demonstranten mit Steinen beworfen werden. Die Polizei wird mit Molotov Cocktails beworfen. Ständig werden Schüsse gefeuert. Die Ganoven, die ins Gebiet kamen, haben alle Zollhäuser überfallen und benutzen diese, so wie Kriminelle halt drauf sind, um im wesentlichen kriminell zu handeln und zu plündern. Die greifen sogar CNN Reporter und andere an. Davon gibt es nun ein Video mit der Schlagzeile „Police in

Ferguson arrest Getty photographer, Scott Ohlson”. Das geschieht auf der anderen Seite. Es gibt also die Polizei, welche mit Tränengas und Gummigeschossen gegen diese vorgeht, scharfe Waffen auf sie zielt und diese verhaftet und die Ganoven welche sie auch angreifen. Voll aasig. Es wird viel tyrannisiert und sich aggressiv verhalten und über die Jahre habe ich außer Kontrolle geratene Polizei-Dienststellen oft mit Straßengangs verglichen.

 

Es ist so krass, dass ich gereizt bin, meine Berichterstatter vollständig von dort abzuziehen und einfach über die Live-Aufnahmen anderer zu berichten, denn es macht keinen Sinn, einen Haufen Ghetto-Assis meine Leute abstechen oder abballern zu lassen. Und übrigens.. Jedes Mal wenn ich diese ganzen Gangmitglieder mit ihren unterm Hintern sackenden Hosen kritisiere, sehe ich bei Infowars.com und Prisonplanet.com und auf YouTube Kommentare wie „Ich wusste doch, dass du voll das Rassisten-Schwein bist, Alex!“ und in Großschrift „Ey, was hast du gegen die Leute?“. Genau die Art Kommentare findet man auf der Website. Versteht ihr? Mir gefällt es nicht, wenn die Polizei in MRAPs mit Schallkanonen die Presse angreift. Mir gefällt es nicht ,wenn die NSA mich illegal belauscht. Mir gefallen die weit offenen Grenzen nicht und genau so wenig die Tatsache, dass wir an ausländische Banken verraten werden und in Richtung Wirtschaftskollaps gelenkt werden. Mir gefällt die Tatsache nicht, dass es sich hier um einen vorsätzliches Abrutschen in den Totalitarismus handelt, welches sogar dokumentiert ist. Aber das heißt nicht, dass ich einen Haufen von Ganoven gutheiße, welche aus Gebieten von St. Louis auftauchen um herumzulaufen und zu sagen „Wir wurden unterdrückt also greifen wir jetzt Reporter und Leute an“. Selbst solche Reporter, welche nur politisch korrekten Quatsch von sich geben.

 

Es ist erstaunlich, dass ein Mord nun einem Haufen Kriminellen das Recht gibt, zu plündern und Brandstiftung zu begehen. Ich war sauer, als die Polizei meine Reporter, Joe Biggs, Corey Jackson und Josh Owens mit Gummigeschossen angriff. Das Auto in dem Josh war, wurde sogar von einer Blendgranate getroffen. Al-Jazeera Reporter wurden auch angegriffen und Reporter der Washington Post verhaftet. Als unser Reporter da war schossen sie mit Gummigeschossen und Tränengas und sie kamen angerannt und zerstörten unsere Kameras und jagten Reporter und dann gehen die am Tag darauf in die Nachrichten und behaupten „Nein, wir helfen den Reportern. Die haben uns gedankt“. So gingen wir also und fanden diese Reporter und die sagten uns „Nein, natürlich haben wir denen nicht gedankt“. Das ist alles Humbug. Es ist eine Kultur der ständigen Lügerei. Einfach widerlich. Gerade in Amerika sehen wir immer häufiger, dass sich alle mehr und mehr wie Ganoven und verrückte Gangster benehmen. Alle wollen andere Menschen dominieren und schikanieren. Dies ist das Ende ritterlicher Tugenden, des gesunden Menschenverstands und das Ende ehrenhaften Verhaltens. Wirklich abscheulich.
Wir haben mehr Videos unserer Reporter, auf dem Gehweg, und anderer Reporter, und dann kommen die Polizisten einfach mit scharfen Waffen und Schrottflinten mit Gummigeschossen, zwei Meter entfernt. Wenn man jemanden von zwei Metern Entfernung mit einem Gummigeschoss anschießt, bringt man den um. Es gab eine Menge Todesfälle verursacht durch Gummigeschosse. Man sieht die ständig in den Nachrichten und auf den Rückseiten von Zeitungen. Der Red Sox Vorfall ist ein berühmter. Erinnert Ihr euch an die World Series vor ca 8 oder 9 Jahren. Ein Mädchen ohne Vorstrafen, eine Studentin an der Uni, die nicht mal wegen des Spiels da war, verließ gegen 22:30 Uhr mit ihrem Freund, auch unvorbestraft, ein Restaurant, als Polizei die Straßen räumte, weil irgendwelche Leute etwas umgekippt hatten und ihr wurde von einem älteren Polizisten aus einer Entfernung von drei Metern… da ist es, „Todesfall der Victoria Snelgrove“… ins Gesicht geschossen, wodurch ihre Augen ins Gehirn gedrückt wurden.

 

Die Bullen waren natürlich stolz und meinten, ja, das passiert halt. So sind die Bullen mit ihren Schrotflinten, welche sie auf unsere Köpfe richten, meine Damen und Herren, mit Gummigeschossen und zwei bis drei echten Patronen. Ich komme damit nicht klar. Da wird es mir richtig übel. Das ist alles gestellt. Es gibt die Black Panthers, die neuen Black Panthers, welche bestenfalls eine schwarze Planungsgruppe sind, welche behaupten es sei an der Zeit für Gewalt. Hier habe ich deren Zitate. Ich habe letzte Nacht einen anderen Artikel auf Infowars.com veröffentlicht, ihr habt den für mich gedruckt. Der ist im Featured News Archiv. Und dann gibt es einen Haufen weiterer Leute die sich einfach über ihr eigenes Leben aufregen, verärgert sind, dass sie keine gut-bezahlten Jobs haben und, dass deren Sozialhilfe-Schecks zu mikrig sind. Oder sie fürchten sich davor, von den Bullen schikaniert zu werden. Die sind auf den Straßen und protestieren, und mittendrin dieser Haufen Ghetto-Opfer. Wie mir diese von MTV und vom Radio propagierte und verkaufte Gangster-Kultur auf die Eier geht. Und unsere Kultur im allgemeinen, es geht hier nicht nur um innerstädtische Afro-Amerikaner, sondern alle möglichen Versionen bizarrer, einschüchternder, möchtegern taffen Kerlen, komischem Landei-Rap und komischem Ghetto Rock’n’Roll und einfach eine Kultur des übereinander Herfallens. Männer die ga rkeine Männer sind, Männer die nie eine Vaterfigur hatten. Menschen die sich verhalten wie Gangster und meinen, sie seien dadurch hart im nehmen und cool.

 

Gleich bei uns einige Videos in denen die Gangster Masken tragen um ihre Identität zu schützen und Polizisten die genau dasselbe tun und einfach die Rohheit. Das macht mir wirklich Angst, denn was wird passieren, wenn der Dollar völlig seinen Wert verliert? Was wird passieren, während das Industriezentrum noch schneller sinkt? Und es gibt Menschen, die sind in der dritten, vierten, fünften Generation im Sozialhilfe System, auf dem Land und in den Städten, einfach überall und die sind nicht im geringsten in der Lage sich selbst zu versorgen. Was passiert während dieses Prozesses, wenn die Roboter den Menschen die meisten pflegerischen Arbeiten und Fabrik-Jobs abnehmen, bis zu den fahrerlosen Autos. Was passieren wird, ist die entworfene Implosion der Gesellschaft und diese stelle ich gleich mit einer Mars Mission, bei der es ein Jahr hin dauert, sechs Monate vor Ort und dann ein Jahr zurück. Der Grund, warum ich noch nie eine Mars Mission wollte ist der, dass es von den Kosten her unmöglich ist, aber auch, da die meisten der Menschen die laufen, werden vermutlich Herzanfälle erleiden, werden wenn sie da sind oder auf dem Rückweg, denn egal wie viel sie trainieren, sogar wenn es ein sich drehender Flugkörper ist, welcher etwas zentrifugale Kraft und Gravitation erzeugt, werden die Menschen Invaliden sein, wenn sie auf die Erde zurückkehren, sollten sie denn überleben.

 

Sie fragen sich wo der Zusammenhang ist? Wir sind vertieft in eine neue Kultur Gen-modifizierter Lebensmittel (GMO) und Umweltverschmutzung durch elektrische Frequenzen und Chemikalien im Essen und im Wasser und wöchentlich 30, 40, 50, gar hunderten Stunden des Fernsehens und vor dem Bildschirm sitzen, wobei man die Abnahme des IQ beobachten kann, wie auch den Anstieg der Erkrankungen. Man sieht die Mutation und De-Evolution der Menschheit vor unser aller Augen, die Verkümmerung…

 

Ich denke an jene Leute die ich kannte, als ich ein kleiner Junge auf dem Land war, welche richtig schwer gearbeitet haben, spitze aussahen und echt taff und cool waren und gehe ich nun dorthin zurück, sieht es aus als seien diejenigen, die noch am Leben und nicht umgezogen sind ,von einer Mutations-Strömung betroffen und tun jetzt nichts mehr außer den ganzen Tag Satelliten-TV zu gucken. Selbst wenn sie arbeitstätig sind, dann im örtlichen Knast oder im Stromspannwerk und es fehlt jegliche Kultur, die warten nur auf ihren Tod. Und ich sehe die Jungen Menschen, nicht so sehr meine Familie, einfach nur die Ortsansässigen und die sehen völlig fertig aus und chillen so ziemlich den ganzen Tag in Jogginghosen, selbst wenn sie arbeiten gehen. Dann sehe ich die innerstädtischen Menschen.. Genau dasselbe. Ich spreche nicht schlecht über sie, weil sie schwarz sind, ich rede ja auch nicht herablassend über die Weißen aus dem Osten von Texas. Die sehen aus und sprechen und benehmen sich höllisch und wurden in Abschaum verwandelt und es ist ekelerregend und verschlechtert sich, denn das System schmiert das Gestell auch noch, um es so schlimm wie möglich werden zu lassen und schreiben noch diese ganzen Bücher in denen sie es zugeben.. Wie sie alle verdummt haben, um uns zur Macht zu führen und in die Endphase. Das ist gewaltsam erzeugter Gesellschaftsrückgang, soziale Atrophie.

 

Meine Absicht war eine Parallele des Vergleichs der Unnatürlichkeit von Menschen in der Schwerelosigkeit aufzuzeigen und wie das eine langfristige Mission im Weltall ausschließt. Ich habe es verglichen mit der künstlichen Umwelt, in der wir uns befinden, mit ihren Smartphones und den elektro-magnetischen Frequenzen und GMO und den Chemikalien und der psychologischen Kriegsführung und der Zerlegung unserer Gesellschaft. Auch die Einfachheit des Lebens im Vergleich zu früher. Man kriegt einen Sozialhilfe-Scheck und holt sich sein Futter obwohl es GMO Dreck ist. Man kann den ganzen Tag faul herumliegen und sich die US-Version von Barbara Salesch reinziehen, Oprah und Sendungen welche dem Deutschem „Hartz IV TV“ ähneln“ und natürlich Stories über die Reichen und Schönen mit ihren Yachten und Hubschraubern um Klassenneid ins Leben rufen. Dann geht man ins Einkaufszentrum und sieht Leute, die trainieren und die Mittelschicht, welche es sich leisten kann keine GMO zu essen und die sehen gesund aus, ob sie nun schwarz oder weiß oder Latein-amerikanisch sind und es entsteht Neid und Hass.

 

Das sieht man, wenn die verdummten Leute vom Lande in die großen Städte kommen und die schönen Menschen in den elitären Gegenden der Stadt sehen. Die drehen am Rad und werden völlig unsicher und das passiert auch mit den verdummten und vergifteten innerstädtischen Menschen, die auch versuchen so erfolgreich zu sein aber in eine künstliche, kranke Kultur geboren wurden, in der jährlich Millionen Kinder gekauft werden und es wird behauptet, sie seien keine Menschen, ohne es besser zu wissen.

 

Ich sitze also nicht herum und gucke mir arme, erbärmliche Leute vom Land an, egal welcher Rasse, um dann auf sie herabzusehen. Ich schaue nicht auf arme innerstädtische Schwarze, welche verdummt wurden, ignorant sind und im System aufwuchsen. Sie tun mir Leid. Trotzdem wurden sie gleichzeitig in eine politische Waffe geschmiedet, genau so, wie die verarmten Menschen, die aus Nicaragua und El Salvador und Guatemala und manchen der gefährlichsten und defektesten Orten der Welt hineinströmen, eine giftige Transfusion. Die werden bei den Demokraten angemeldet und bei der Sozialhilfe-Klasse, um die neuen politischen Vollstrecker unserer Nation zu sein. Man kann sehe, was die Technokratie anstellt. Schicken Unmengen von Somaliern nach Minnesota, New York und Vegas, die das Taxi-Geschäft übernehmen. Ich hab nichts gegen Somalier, aber wir sprechen von einem Ort, an dem der Totale Zusammenbruch der Gesellschaft geschehen ist, da herrscht das Steinzeitalter, Barbarei und Kultur wo Frauen schlechter behandelt werden als Tiere. Und es ist politisch korrekt, ach was für ein niedliches Volk, die nehmen wir an, ach Gottchen.

 

Trägt man Levis, ist ein weißer LKW-Fahrer, ein kranker Rassist und Homophobe, der nicht mal weiß, wie man die New York Times liest, heißt es ach, du Hölle, gib den Weißen, wie krass der ist. Aber ohhhh. Kommt man aus Somalia oder vom Sudan, wo die kleinen Mädchen sexuell verstümmelt und sie im Haus einsperrt werdeb und dann können wir hier in Amiland auch Frauen anketten? Oh, das ist deren Kultur, tja, meine Kultur ist Waffen zu besitzen und Frauen gut zu behandeln und privates Gelände zu besitzen und wohlhabend zu sein und erfolgreich und von der Polizei nicht wie ein Sklave behandelt zu werden und ich bin frech und werde nicht nachgeben und mich nicht schikanieren lassen und deswegen behandelt die Polizei mich mit Respekt, denn die wissen das. Ich bring die vor Gericht, die wissen, dass ich für meine Rechte einstehe. Die wollen meine Diener sein, die wollen die Verfassung schützen? Dann werde ich sie unterstützen und verehren. Die wollen paramilitärische Ganoven werden, die für ein Paar Verdummte Unterschichtler auf einer gammelnden Nation sitzen?

 

Ich lasse mich nicht so behandeln, wie die ganzen Unterschichtler. Ich werde mich nicht in die Gosse niederlegen. Ich werde mich nicht weiter übergehen lassen. Ich werde nicht weiter Bürokraten tolerieren die ohne Durchsuchungsbefehl zu mir ins Haus oder in mein Büro kommen. Ich werde den Uniformierten nicht den Hintern küssen. Das ist alles veraltet, so wie Federschmuck und Kronen. Ich mag die Queen of England nicht und würde mich vor ihr auch nicht verneigen, würde sie vorbeilaufen. Die haben mich eingeladen, die Queen of England kennenzulernen und meinten, ich müsse mich vor ihr verbeugen, der Frau die auf Kosten der Engländer lebt und ihre Familie, ein Haufen Thronräuber seit hundertenvon Jahren, da will ich mich übergeben. All eure feierlichen Kleider und Kopfbedeckungen und Kostüme sind völlig wertlos, wenn sie nicht für die Republik und Freiheit stehen, nur dann wäre ich für eure Symbolik. Symbole haben Kraft. Ich trage eine Dekoration einer Nickel-Gürtelschnalle, welche Männer ehrt, die sich weigerten im Angesicht ihrer Unterdrücker ihre Waffen aufzugeben. Aber wie der Führer von Babylon, König George III und viele andere.

 

Ich möchte nun die Leitungen freischalten um Eure Meinung in Sachen Ferguson zu hören, die klaren Beweise, dass es dort Leute vom Justice Department (Justizministerium) und von der neuen Black Panther Party gibt, welche darauf aus sind, Probleme zu erzeugen und eindeutig Gewalt zum Ziel haben. Unsere Reporter wurden letztens beinahe überfahren von einem Auto, aus dem dann Leute in Ski-Masken sprangen und weg rannten. Es gibt MSNBC Reporter, CNN Reporter, die in den letzten Tagen mit Steinen beworfen wurden. Chris Hayes zuletzt… Wir haben CNN Reporter, die von der Polizei verhaftet werden. Es ist ein Haufen stumpfsinnige Barbarei und zeigt wie ignorant die Öffentlichkeit ist, aber auch wie ignorant die Polizisten dessen sind, was um sie herum geschieht. Und von Anfang an waren die FBI-Agenten da, um Rat zu geben und sogar bevor das alles begonnen hatte, waren sie da um die örtlichen Polizisten auszubilden.

 

Dies bringt mich zum Bericht ,der zur Zeit auf Drudgereport.com zu sehen ist, der ist auch bei Infowars.com. Wir haben gestern einen Bericht ausgestrahlt, ein Dokument, die Armee bereitet sich darauf vor, während wesentlicher Proteste in den Vereinigten Staaten mit tödlicher Gewalt gegen unbewaffnete Zivilisten vorzugehen, aber sie müssen einen Präzedenzfall für das Militär schaffen und der Polizei kommt es vor, wie eine vernünftige Mission einer linken Seite von Drudge. Eine Armee-Anleitung welche von Vorbereitungen auf Massen-Aufstände in den Vereinigten Staaten erzählt und davon „unbewaffneten Zivilisten mit Scharfschützen zu begegnen“, Scharfschützen… Man kann das letzten Freitag öffentlich freigegebene Armee Dokument lesen. Die Öffentlichkeit entdeckte es gestern, wir schrieben darüber. Keine der Dinosaurier Medien haben dieses bedeutsame Dokument bisher erwähnt. In der Tat habe ich dieses Dokument gestern ausgedruckt, es ist im Fernsehstudio. Alle Amerikaner werden von den Globalisten beraubt, alle Amerikaner. 99.99% von uns sind auf der falschen Seite der Tyrannei und wir sollten alle Freiheit, Gerechtigkeit und Wahrheit zu schätzen wissen und alle Probleme anprangern die wir erkennen und versuchen etwas dagegen zu tun.

 

Ich möchte die Telefon-Nummer herausgeben und dann, wenn wir die nächste Stunde beginnen, werden wir mit unseren Reportern vor Ort darüber sprechen was sie in Ferguson erlebt haben und mehr. Und wir werden die Unruhen analysieren, Anleitung ATP-3-39.33 (U.S. Army Techniques Publication 3-39.33: Civil Disturbances

August 15, 2014) welche im April diesen Jahres erstellt wurde, eine bestätigte Republik-Veröffentlichung, uneingeschränkte Verbreitung, letzten Freitag, Hauptquartier des U.S.Verteidigungsministeriums.

 

North Com (United States Northern Command) geht nun öffentlich gegen Amerikaner vor. Die Armee und Marine übt öffentlich die Entwaffnung der Anhänger der Tea-Party Bewegung, ländliche Gemeinden welche die Belagerungszustände nicht akzeptieren werden. Das ist laut Dokumenten der Haupt-Schwerpunkt. Die werden anstößige Gangster und Leute dazu benutzen opportunistisch Gebäude abzufackeln und die Polizei mit Molotov Cocktails zu beschmeißen, um einen Vorwand für die Nutzung der MRAPs (Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Vehicle) und der Schallkanonen, Gummigeschosse und Kameras und Mikrofonen überall zu schaffen, schlimmer als Orwells 1984. Das geschieht gerade. Die werden die Bedrohung durch Al Qaeda benutzen um uns die Freiheit zu nehmen, wobei sie sie (Al Qaeda) doch öffentlich mit Waffen ausstatten. Wenn die Öffentlichkeit das bemerkt, dann erhalten die halt einen neuen Namen, ISIS, ESIS, ISIS, IS, all die verschieden Namen um die Öffentlichkeit verwirrt zu halten. Dies ist eine Methode, die wird gegen die Menschen von Ferguson angwandt, gegen die Ganoven die aufgetaucht sind und gegen die Staatspolizei, die örtliche Polizei und die Nationalgarde. Die sind alle da, voneinander abgetrennt, und ihnen wird das neue Polizeistaat Modell beigebracht, welches in Seattle in ’99 und Katrina in 2005 und bei der WTEO erstmalig erprobt wurde.

 

Wir haben die WTEO wiederholt in Kanada, in Ottawa, in London, England, in Pttsburgh Pennsylvania erfasst, dokumentiert, kam sogar in den Massenmedien, Polizei verkleidet als Anarchisten welche andere Polizisten angreifen um einen Angriff der Ansammlung von Demonstranten zu rechtfertigen. Wir haben bisher keine klare, bestätigten Beweise, dass dies auch hier geschehen ist, denn es sind Reporter dort und wir wissen worauf zu achten ist.

 

Es kann sein, dass die Polizei moralisch handelt, aber es ist schriftlich dokumentiert, dass sie Anarchisten und Provokateure anheuerten und beschützten. Die Delta Force leitet das Ganze. Das kam in drei Seattle Zeitungen, Seattle Post, Intelligencer, und so weiter, und es gab einen Film darüber. Mir ist aber klar, dass das durch die Steuer-befreiten Stiftungen finanziert wird, Ford Foundation und andere welche dokumentiert die Black Panther Partei finanzieren, die neue Black Panther Partei, La Raza, Metzia und all diese Rassen-bezogenen Gruppen. Die haben Gruppen wie das Southern Poverty Law Centre und andere Gruppen dabei ertappt, wie sie als suprematistische (artifiziell gebildete) Gruppen operieren. Nicht um Gruppen zu infiltrieren, sondern um sie dazu zu bringen,herumzulaufen und geschmacklose Dinge zu sagen um in den Gemeinden Ärger zu erregen damit sie die schwarze Gemeinschaft weiter in die Hände der Intelligenzlosen treiben können, idiotische Clowns der neuen Black Panther Partei, welche zweifellos nützliche Idioten in den niedrigen Rängen sind, das FBI ganz oben.

 

Khalid Mohammed, „Wir töten die Frauen, wir töten die Kinder, wir töten die Babies, wir töten die schönen blauäugigen Babies, ja, so ist es, denn aus dem blauäugigen Baby wird mal ein großer Teufel werden, welcher versuchen wird unsere Babies zu töten. Und dann liegt die weiße Frau alle neun Monate auf ihrem Rücken und liefert dem Militär-Produktions Zentrum Nachschub.“

 

Übrigens kann man den Clip finden, ich kann den auch nahezu perfekt imitieren. Ich liebe Imitationen, wie alle wissen. „Oh Liebling, frag die Erdkreatur“. Man wird als Rassist beschimpft, imitiert man Khalid Mohammed. Ich bin nicht gegen Marsmenschen und habe gerade eine Imitation von Marsmenschen gemacht. Was ist mit Optimus Prime, „Sind Roboter Transformer Einführung, Transformer Einführung, Ich bin Optimus Prime“ Noch eins, „Hier ist CNN“ Ziemlich gut, gell? Manchmal habe ich einen ziemlichen Galgenhummer wie ich schon oft erwähnt habe.

 

Hier ist eine kostenfrei Nummer, ich möchte mit Erstmals-Anrufern über Ferguson sprechen aber auch von Ihnen hören, wovon uns das ganze Ihrer Meinung nach abführen und ablenken soll? Obama hat unsere Grenzen geöffnet und alle Illegalen legalisiert. Dieser Bericht scheint die Leute richtig wach zu stimmen und dann passiert das. Niemand redet mehr über den VA Skandal (Veterans Health Administration scandal of 2014) und die Todeslisten. Niemand ist dafür in Schwierigkeiten geraten, die hatten Todes-Ausschüsse für die Veteranen. Ich meine, guckt doch mal, was für eine grausame Regierung das ist. Niemand spricht von den Preisen für Fleisch, die höher sind als je zuvor, auf Grund von Abbau von Farmen im ganzen Land und der Abwertung des Dollars. Niemand spricht über Texas, Breitbart, 45 Millionen um Außenminister zu schulen, alleine dieses Jahr, laut dem Texas Education General Council Audit. Niemand spricht darüber, denn dies ist der große Festumzug. Oh mein Gott, jemand wurde getötet. Ein Mann stirbt und es ist eine Tragödie, 10.000 sterben und es ist eine Statistik. Josef Stalin sagte das und es stimmt. Ich rede mit Schwarzen, die sagen „Niemand will die hässlichen schwarzen Babies“. Ihr habt es gehört, ich habe die Clips hier gezeigt.

 

Ich hatte schwarze Führer in meinen Studios, Sozialisten, vor Rob machten sie alles, hatten das Interview und es ist so zum Erbrechen.. Die sagen im Wesentlichen, es gäbe zu viele Schwarze. Ich meine, das ist so grauenvoll, denn die sind interne Agenten der demokratischen Partei. Deren Aufgabe ist es sicherzustellen, dass es Schwarzen nie gelingt, Freiheit zu erlangen und finanziellen Erfolg zu haben. Man kann als Schwarzer lediglich Rapper oder NFL Footballspieler werden. Wie viele Plätze gibt es schon für professionellen Sport? Oder eine HipHop-Sensation zu sein. Vielleicht 10.000 für alle professionellen Sportarten und all den Rap Jobs und der ganzen Coolness. Es gibt wie viele Millionen Schwarze in dieser Nation? 12% der Bevölkerung ist schwarz, 12% aus 315 Millionen. Da bleibt kein Platz für 99.9% der Leute aber trotzdem meint jeder, und nicht nur Schwarze, auch weiße die gerade von der Uni kommen sie können alle Superstars werden. Die laufen völlig wahnhaft durch die Gegend und suchen überall nach berühmten Schauspielern.

 

Was für eine wahnsinnige Gesellschaft, jeder will ein großer Star sein, das Ganze ist bizarr. Denn so erreicht man etwas, nicht in dem man ein ehrenhafter Vater oder eine ehrenhafte Mutter ist und seiner Gemeinde hilft und für eine bessere Gesellschaft sorgt und in der Garage Dinge aus Holz schnitzt oder etwas malt und es dann am Wochenende verkauft, weil einem das Spaß macht. Oder sich mit Gärtnerei beschäftigen oder Mountain Biking oder dem Klettersport oder ehrenamtlich zu beschäftigen oder mit Poesie. Es gibt eine Menge glücklicher Menschen, die haben ihre Hobbys, ihre Leidenschaften, die sind erfüllt und nicht deprimiert. Jetzt gibt es diese ganzen erfolgsorientierten jungen Großstadtmenschen.. Gerade hier in Austin wo ich jetzt wohne.. Austin wurde ruiniert.

 

Kostenfrei Nummer zu uns in die Sendung 8002599231. Wir öffnen die Leitungen genau jetzt. 8002599231,8002599231. Ich komme einfach nur zum wesentlichen Problem in der Gesellschaft. LA ist zusammengebrochen. Junge Frauen in Amerika, jedes hübsche Mädchen wenn es 18 wird, ich meine ein großer Anteil von ihnen gehen da hin und wollen Schauspielerinnen werden. Die gehen also und ja, ich habe einen Film in dem du ein Star sein kannst und das führt zu einer Flut von jungen Frauen die vor der Kamera Sex haben und das treibt so die Preise so weit herunter, dass sie dafür weniger Geld machen als eine Nutte. Man macht da weniger Geld als in der Prostitution und trotzdem machen da Frauen mit, denn ihnen wurde gesagt so wären sie ein Star. Seht mal, ich bin ein Star, ich bin im Playboy, oh mein Gott! Sie ist ein Modell für dies oder das… Und dann sind die wenigen Frauen, die etwas Erfolg haben auch völlig unglücklich mit ihrem Leben. Oder wenn ihr Aussehen den Bach runter geht, bleibt ihnen nur noch der Suizid. Die hatten nie Kinder, keine Enkel und haben den Kreislauf des Lebens nie kennengelernt, nie die Rassen-Erinnerungen erfahren welche in einer jeden Rasse aktiviert werden, wenn man dem Übergangsritus folgt.

 

41 Millionen Schwarze in der USA, diese Zahl wurde uns gegeben und es gibt ca 10.000 Plätze für Stars. Vielleicht… Viele dieser Plätze sind C und D und F bis hin zum Z Niveau der Berühmtheit. Für die gibt es jetzt all diese Branchen, wo jeder nun Tänzer oder Teil einer Blaskapelle oder in Schauspielunterricht sein werden und es sind all diese wahnsinnigen Leute, welche ständig wieder und wieder Schauspiel-Unterricht nehmen… Die versuchen Stars zu werden und Extras in Filmen und dann himmeln die jene an, die es geschafft haben und es ist so langweilig und unerfüllt und so künstlich und es geht darum, dass wenn es ihnen Spaß machen würde, ständig in Schauspiel-Unterrichte zu gehen und Extras in Filmen zu spielen wäre es ja okay, aber 90% von denen tun das nur, weil sie sich unerfüllt füllen, außer sie können es ins Fernsehen oder auf die große Leinwand schaffen.

 

Ich war selbst schon auf der großen Leinwand. Jeder, der versucht hat in Filmen zu sein, wurde in Filmen plaziert. Mir wurde angeboten, in einem Haufen anderer Filme mitzuspielen, große Rollen, ich lehnte ab, denn ich weiß wie langweilig es ist. Ich möchte meine Radio Sendung nicht aufgeben, um nach Los Angeles zu ziehen oder Neu Seeland oder Toronto oder New York und Teil dieser leeren Kultur zu sein. Wisst ihr wie leer diese Filmstars sind? Wie unglücklich die sind? Warum glaubt ihr denn, dass immer wieder Hollywood Leute sich an mich wenden? Weil sie nach was Echtem suchen. Und diejenigen die erwacht sind, sprechen jetzt über diese Angelegenheiten. Wie Richard Linklater, der schon immer ein Lappen war, noch nie eine Berühmtheit und die Filme die er macht. Ich nehme jetzt nach einer kurzen Pause eure Anrufe entgegen und dann schalten wir gegen 12:30 zu unseren Reportern, damit ich viele Anrufe annehmen kann.

 

Unsere Reporter sind vor Ort und erforschen die Provokateure und die Ford Foundation, die neue Black Panther Partei und sie dokumentieren auch die Polizei und deren bizarres Verhalten, zum Beispiel die Verhaftung unschuldiger Reporter, die nichts getan haben und sie schießen weiter hin auf Leute. Es ist einfach unfassbar. Ich werde einfach mal berichten was da vor sich geht. Es wird jetzt immer deutlicher, dass Mr. Brown… „Mehr als ein Dutzend Zeugen der Schießerei bestätigen die Version des Ferguson Polizisten“. „Michael Brown stürzte sich auf den Beamten“, CNN. „Anzahl militanter Demonstranten wächst, viele kommen von außerhalb des Staates. Es ist wie ein Kriegsfest, wie ein Kriegsfass. Alle Kulturen tun es. Es ist wie eine primitive.. wie die Schotten, die aus den Hügeln kamen, um die Engländer anzugreifen. Es ist genau dasselbe. Oder die Zulus, die kamen um die Niederländer in Süd-Afrika anzugreifen. Ich mein, genau das geschieht hier. Oder die Indianer, die sich an einem Kriegsfest beteiligten. Das geschieht hier, geht raus und zeigt allen, dass ihr Männer seid. Zeigt es ihnen. Und wie macht man das jetzt? Man trägt Goldketten um seinen Hals, lässt die Hosen sacken und läuft durch die Gegend und schreit den ganzen Tag rassistische Grabinschriften, weil jemand von der Polizei ermordet wurde. Dann fällt das in die Hände des Systems, welches Nutzen daraus schafft. „Senator behauptet die Demonstranten sind wortwörtlich eingedrungen“. Das hat die Staatspolizei auch behauptet und es ist wahr, unsere Reporter bestätigen das. „Tränengas und Rauch hängen über St Louis‘ Außenbezirk“. „Black Power wird im Chor gegrölt“. „Vater eines toten Teenagers an Obama, ‚Ich habe Sie gewählt, kommen Sie und treffen Sie sich mit mir’“.

 

Es geht alles über in ein großes, schauspielerisches Ereignis, wie eine Feier oder so. Buchanan sagt des weiteren, dass „Proteste wie aus den 60ern könnten dazu führen, dass der Präsident abgestraft wird“. „Manche Liberalen schaffen eine nahezu Lynch-Mob Mentalität“. Da stimme ich überein. „MSNBC Crew wurde während live Berichterstattung mit Steinen beworfen“. Ja, die sind dort und verehren die gewalttätigen Demonstranten und verschleiern für die und hetzen Rassen aufeinander. Wisst ihr noch beim Weißen Haus? Und die werden nun mit Steinen beworfen. Unsere Reporter werden mehr und mehr durch militante Unterschichtler beschimpft, welche nun auftauchen. Gleich mehr dazu. Ist das Marcus Morellis in dem Video? Ich bin noch nicht mal zu unseren Reportern gekommen oder zu CNN und dem Rest von allem, aber es ist einfach so.. Man..Findet meine Kopie davon, die Schlacht um Gold, eine Sammlung von Briefen zurück an den Senat durch Julius Caesar darüber, wie man verwaltet, was heute Deutsche und Franzosen und Österreicher sind. Die Gallier, die Westgoten, die Ostgoten, und es ist genau dasselbe Problemzeug, genau die selbe Manipulation, die exakt selben Polizei Schild Wände und Phalangen, nichts ändert sich wirklich. Wie man Massen manipuliert, wie man provoziert und wie man trennt und erobert und wie man die Frauen als Herrscher der Männer arrangiert. Und dann sitze ich hier und beobachte die Sozialtechnik, die stattfindet, während das Pentagon sich darauf vorbereitet, große Massen von Amerikanern zu ermorden. Das wird während einem völligem Wirtschaftskollaps geschehen und dahin steuert uns das Establishment, darum geht es mir. Ich möchte nun zu euren Anrufen kommen.

 

Nochmal, ich bin Ihr Moderator Alex Jones und sollten Sie eben erst eingeschaltet haben, Steve der Russe, Henry Mad Wit, Brent und andere. Wisst ihr Leute, ich sage gerne eure Namen, aber manchmal wird das Ganze selbst ein ziemliches Wagnis. Wenn ihr einfach nur erwähnen könnt welche Namen wir nennen sollen und wir sprechen die eh nie richtig aus, wisst ihr? Mich kotzt alles nur noch an. Warum ist die Öffentlichkeit so naiv? Warum lassen sich Leute so einfach ausspielen? Warum sind die Menschen so unbelesen? Warum sind die so verdummt? Warum glauben die so gerne an nigerianische E-Mails? Warum gibt es überall in Austin Leute, die darauf hoffen Stars zu werden, alle narzisstisch und hängengeblieben. Ich kenne so viele Leute die, wenn sie versagen berühmt zu werden, sich selbst einfach einreden, sie seien berühmt. Man, ich komm einfach nicht mehr klar. Ich will ja kein Pessimist sein und es tut mir leid, dass ich jetzt etwas sauer werde. Ich sehe einfach die arrangierte Spaltung für den Zweck der Eroberung unserer Nation und mir wird richtig schlecht dabei. Und würde die Öffentlichkeit doch nur wach werden, dann könnten wir das Ruder noch herumreißen.

 

Der Russe in Washington, du bist Live dabei. Was gibt’s?

 

CA:     Yeah, Alex, der Russki is dran. Ich stelle mich so vor, damit Leute wissen, dass ich wirklich aus Russland stamme. Ich bin 1991 hergezogen, nach dem Zerfall der Soviet Union und wollte einfach etwas Hintergrund geben.

 

AJ       Ich denke es ist sehr interessant, dass Du in der Lage bist Parallelen zwischen dem Leben im Kommunismus zu dem aktuellen Geschehen hier zu ziehen. Schieße los!

 

CA:     Nun ja, genau darum geht es mir. Ich bin hergezogen nachdem die Soviet Union zerfallen war und lebe zur Zeit in Washington. Was ich nicht verstehe, ist zum Beispiel, von meiner Familie zogen alle her und meine Eltern lebten einige Zeit im sowjetischen Kommunismus. Nach dem sie hergezogen waren, fingen sie sich an zu ändern, deren Verstand fing an sich zu ändern und nach vielleicht fünf oder zehn Jahren verstummten sie einfach in Bezug auf Russland und Amerika. Als wir zuerst hergezogen waren, wohnten wir in Toledo, Ohio und wir konnten die Türen und Fenster nachts offen lassen und keiner brach ein oder klaute uns was, alles war völlig in Ordnung.

 

Nun ist die Wirtschaft schwach und die Leute auch, die Einwohner der Vereinigten Staaten sind völlig hirnlos geworden und es ist nun so weit, dass meine Eltern die Wahrheit völlig Leugnen. So etwa, ey, die Wirtschaft ist am Boden, alles verschlechtert sich. Ich zeige denen Beweise aus Dokumenten, Nachrichten, Beiträgen und so weiter, ich versuche das denen zu erklären und die sehen mich an und sagen „Nikol, Amerika wird nie etwas schlimmer passieren“. Ich denk nur, wollt ihr mich vereppeln? Ich meine, wir kommen aus Russland wo alles zugrunde ging, ihr wusstet daß alles zerfällt. Der Afghanistan Krieg, es gab nie einen, aber er war mit ein Grund für Russlands Pleite. Amerika ist in so viele Kriege verwickelt, wir haben weltweit über 100 Militärbasen.

 

 

AJ Und wir werden künstlich dazu gesteuert das zu tun. Hervorragende Argumente. Menschen sind Beobachter geworden. Das Fernsehen hat es geschafft. Deren Verstände wurden programmiert, so dass die Öffentlichkeit nur noch Schafe sind und keine echten Menschen.

Ich habe nicht ein Mal so viele der Nachrichten durchgenommen. Ich habe hauptsächlich über die Lage der Menschheit gesprochen, von der offensichtlich ist, dass sie degeneriert. Nun, es gibt hoch-gebildete, informierte Menschen denen bewusst ist, was vor sich geht. Die schlagen Gewinn an der Lage und deren Einstellung ist natürlich „nur weiter so“, denn man kann nichts für die Massen tun, die alle Gehirnwäschen unterzogen wurden. Die waren schon immer Sklaven und werden dies auch immer sein. Aber ich habe die Renaissance studiert, ich habe studiert…

 

Dummheit ist, wenn jemand nicht weiß, was er wissen könnte.

Political correctness ist, wenn man aus Feigheit lügt, um Dumme nicht zu verärgern, die die Wahrheit nicht hören wollen.

Antisemitismus ist, wenn man Juden, Israel übelnimmt, was man anderen nicht übelnimmt.

Wahnsinn bedeute, immer wieder das Gleiche zu tun, aber dabei stets ein anderes Resultat zu erwarten

Wenn ein Affe denkt, „ich bin ein Affe“, dann ist es bereits ein Mensch

Ein Mensch mit Wurzeln soll zur Pediküre gehen.

Gutmenschen sind Menschen, die gut erscheinen wollen, die gewissenlos das Gewissen anderer Menschen zu eigenen Zwecken mit Hilfe selbst inszenierter Empörungen instrumentalisieren.

 

http://www.jsbielicki.com/jsb-79.htm

DJ Psycho Diver Sant – too small to fail
Tonttu Korvatunturilta Kuunsilta JSB
Tip tap tip tap tipetipe tip tap heija!
www.psychosputnik.com
http://www.saatchionline.com/jsbielicki
https://psychosputnik.wordpress.com/

 

Alex Jones on Social Atrophy[2]

Key:

VO = Voiceover

AJ = Alex Jones

CA = Caller

s.l. = sounds like

 

 

VO:     Big Brother, mainstream media, Government cover-ups. You want answers? Well so does he. He’s Alex Jones on the GCN Radio Network. And now, live from Austin, Texas, Alex Jones.

AJ:      Our reporters are on the ground in Ferguson, Missouri that’s now become an international news story and threatens to engulf the country in more riots and looting. We’re here trying to objectively break down how the police state is not good for anybody but the Globalists that have hi-jacked this country. That is unless though there are miscreant forces coming into the area in Ferguson out of St Louis, trying to stir things up. We’ve got the New Black Panthers calling for violence, we’ve got reports that our reporters have confirmed of molotov cocktails and shots being fired. So the police then went completely wild and began attacking everyone, including reporters. And then they had a late-night press conference saying that, “Well, unless you have a $50,000 camera”, this is an actual quote, “and a news van basically, we don’t know you’re a reporter.”

 

So that is ongoing. We had our reporters there in the press conference, Joe Biggs, literally, right next to the State Police spokesman and they were just ignoring their serious questions. So that’s coming up. The situation is obviously deteriorating quickly but we need to look at all the other news. The open borders, the wars the Globalists are starting, the destabilisation in the Middle East, the ongoing devaluation of the dollar. We don’t have a guest on until the third hour. It’s best selling author of Police State USA: How Orwell’s Nightmare is Becoming our Reality“ (by Cheryl K. Chumley). We carry and sell the book, and the book is so informative that I actually learned something from it and I don’t say that arrogantly. I’m probably the leading expert when it comes to full spectrum analysis of how the police state really works. Just because I’ve been studying and reading the Rand Corporation Documents, reading the Pentagon Papers, for almost two decades. I didn’t wake up to this for a couple of years on air, so maybe 18 years. Her book’s powerful because she’s a well known journalist, did a deep research on what’s currently going on. So she’ll be joining us to discuss the police state that finally people are getting concerned about.

When we say police state, the slang connotation is that means not liking police and that’s how they brainwash the police that if someone talks about a police state, why, you don’t like the police. No, what we don’t like is living in a mix of North Korea and Nazi Germany meets Mexico, meets Guatemala, meets Nigeria. When you have tanks and police in paramilitary uniform is wearing masks, you live in a third-world country, you live in an unstable cesspit.

When they’re rolling around with sound cannons and rubber bullets and the rest of it, this is the sign of a country in deep trouble. Along with our giant, untenable, fraudulent debt, along with the NSA spying, along with the President operating as a dictator, this country is a mess. And we’ve got military police, now joined by the National Guard, militarised police now joined by the National Guard, pointing guns, now into week two, almost week three coming up, at our reporters and being very aggressive and very hateful.   Which if you were even an occupying army, would not be a good bearing to have. It would cost more resistance which shows you the training is all for a perfect storm of just disaster.

 

So we’ll look at all of it coming up and then Cheryl Chumley, „Police State USA” will be

joining us. I intend to open the phones up early in this hour and take a lot of phone calls. For first-time callers in the first hour and then we’ll have wide open phones in the second hour and then our guest joining us. It’s all coming up today, Infowars.com, Prison Planet.com, are the main websites.

 

We are live, broadcasting worldwide from Austin, Texas. Our reporters, now going into week number two, have been reporting on the ground from Ferguson, Missouri on what is a demo for martial law nationwide. Our reporters have got on video of this, they can confirm, that journalists are having rocks thrown at them by the supposedly ‘perfect angel’ protesters. There are molotov cocktails being thrown at police, there are shots being fired, this did happen last night and it’s ongoing. The hoodlums that have come into the area as the Head of the State Police have said, have invaded and are using all of the bedlam, like criminals do, to basically engage in criminal activity, looting, you name it. They’re even attacking CNN reporters and others, there’s now a video of that. Headline, “Police in Ferguson arrest Getty photographer, Scott Ohlson”. That’s happening on the other side, so you’ve got the police arresting reporters, tear gassing them, shooting them with rubber bullets, aiming guns at them and you’ve got the hoodlums attacking them. Truly disgusting.

There’s a lot of bullying and thuggish behaviour going on and I’ve likened out of control police agencies over the years to a street gang.

 

It’s so bad that I’m just tempted to pull my reporters completely out of there and just have them cover the press conferences and talk to eye witnesses and just report on other peoples’ live feeds because there’s no point in letting a bunch of gang bangers stab or shoot my reporters. And by the way, every time I criticise all the gang bangers with their pants hanging down around their butts and running around cussing everybody and breaking out windows, I see comments on Infowars.com, Prison Planet.com and U-tube, “I knew you were racist, Alex” in all caps, “Why are you hating on people?”. These are the type of comments that you can go to the website and read. You understand, I don’t like the police driving around in MRAPs with sound cannons attacking the press. I don’t like the NSA illegally spying on me, I don’t like the wide open borders, I don’t like the fact we’re sold out to foreign banks and being manoeuvred towards economic collapse. I don’t like the fact that it’s a premeditated slide towards totalitarianism in this country on record. But it doesn’t mean then I endorse a bunch of hoodlum people, showing up out of areas of St Louis to run around and say, “We’ve been oppressed so we’re going to attack reporters and people”.

Even reporters that are there spilling politically correct baloney.

 

It’s amazing that because somebody got shot and killed, now that gives a bunch of

criminals a right to loot and burn stuff down.    I got mad when the police were shooting rubber bullets at my reporters, Joe Biggs and Corey Jackson and Josh Owens.   Flash banging the car Josh was in. Attacking the Al-Jazeera reporters and arresting The Washington Post reporter. While Jakari was there, they were shooting

rubber bullets, teargas and they’d run up and they break down the camera equipment,

chase the reporters down the road and then they go on the news the next day and say,

“No, we were helping the reporters. They thanked us”. So we went and found the reporters and they said, “No, of course we don’t thank them”. It’s pure bull. It’s just a culture of lying everywhere. It’s just disgusting.   And more and more in America that’s what we see just with everybody is acting like a bunch of hoodlum, crazy gangsters. Just wanting to dominate and push people around. It is the end of chivalry, it is the end of common sense, it’s the end of being honourable, it is just truly disgusting.

 

We have more videos of our reporters, on the sidewalk, and other reporters, and then the police just walk up with, in force, with live ammo in them and others with shotguns with rubber bullets in them, five feet away. If you shoot somebody with rubber bullets at five feet away, you will kill them. There’s been a lot of rubber bullet deaths, you see them in the news all the time in the back of the paper. The famous one was the Red Sox one, remember the World Series, that was about eight, nine years ago, I forget.   A girl with no criminal record, college student, with her boyfriend, no criminal record, not even a misdemeanour, like ten thirty at night when they walked out of a restaurant, she wasn’t even there for the Red Sox and the riot police were clearing people off the street that had dumped some stuff over, and a cop, a senior one, walked right up at 10 feet away, there it is, “Death of Victoria Snelgrove” and shot her in the eyes and nose, driving here eyeballs back into her brain.

The cops you know, were very proud of themselves, oh this is what happens. You’ve got cops with shotguns pointing them at peoples’ heads, ladies and gentlemen, with rubber bullets and two to three rounds that aren’t rubber. I just can’t handle it, it makes me want to throw up. The whole thing’s contrived. You’ve got the Black Panthers, the New Black Panthers, at best a black plan group, running around saying it’s time for violence, I’ve got their quotes here. I’ve got another article out on the Infowars.com last night it’s scrolled off, you guys printed that for me it’s in the featured news archive. And then you’ve got all these other people that are just upset about their lives, upset that they don’t have good paying jobs, or their welfare cheques aren’t big enough or they’re scared of being pushed around by the cops. They’re out protesting and then just mixed in with it are all these hoodlums.

I’m just sick of the hoodlum culture that’s sold and promoted by MTV and the radio and the culture across the board, it’s not just inner-city Blacks, it’s all sorts of versions of weird, bully, fake tough guy, weird country rap and weird hoodlum rock ‘n roll and just a culture of just trashing us. Men who aren’t men, men that never had dads around. People that just think acting like thugs is tough and it’s cool.

We’ve got some of those clips coming up and I see the hoodlums with masks on their faces covering up who they are and the police doing it and just the rudeness. It freaks me out because what’s going to happen when the dollar fully devalues?   What’s going to happen as the industrial base sinks even faster?   And we’ve got people that are third, fourth, fifth generation living on welfare in the countryside, in the inner-cities, everywhere, who don’t know how to provide for themselves. What’s going to happen during this flux when the robots replace the humans with most jobs from custodial positions to factory jobs, to driverless cars?   What’s going to happen is the designed implosion of society and I liken it to a Mars mission that takes a year there, six months on the ground and a year back. The reason I haven’t wanted a Mars mission is because it’s cost prohibitive but also because most of the people that go will probably end up having heart attacks once they get there or on the way back because no matter how much exercise they do, even if it’s a spacecraft that’s spinning, that creates some centrifugal force and some gravity, the people will be like invalids once they return to Earth, even if they survive.

 

You say what’s that to do with this? We are immersed in a whole new culture of GMO and electrical frequency pollution and chemicals in the food and water and hundreds of hours a week, for many people, for a lot of folks, thirty, forty, fifty hours a week of television and screen time and you can see the IQs dropping, you can see the numbers of diseases and illnesses sky rocketing. You can see the mutation and the de-evolution of humanity in front of everyone, the degeneration.

 

I think about the people I knew when I was a little kid in the countryside that were super hardworking, super good looking, super tough, super cool and now I go back to where my family’s from and it looks like people that are still alive there and hadn’t moved out have been hit by a mutation race and all they do is watch satellite tv all day. Even if they have a job in town it’s at a prison or at a power plant and there’s no culture and they are literally just waiting to die. And I see the young people, not even so much my family but just the locals, and they look like absolute hell and never even basically get out of their pyjamas all day long, even if they go to a job. Then I see the inner-city people, just exactly the same thing. It’s not that I’m putting them down because they’re black, it’s like I’m not putting down white people in East Texas. They look and talk and act like hell and have been turned into trash and it’s disgusting and it’s getting worse and the system’s greasing the skids to make it as bad as they can and write all these text books admitting it. That they’ve dumbed everyone down to bring us into Government and the end game, is force population reduction.

I was trying to draw the parallel of the analogy that the unnaturalness of humans in zero gravity and how that’s prohibitive to long-term or long duration missions in space.   I was likening it to the artificial environment we’re in with the smart phones and the electro-magnetic frequencies and the GMO and the chemicals and then the psychological warfare and the cultural breakdown. Also the easiness of life compared to what it used to be. You get a welfare cheque, you go and get food even though it’s GMO crud. You can lay around and watch Judge Judy all day, you can lay around and watch Oprah Winfrey all day and then see stories of the Rich and Famous and then have class envy of people who have yachts and helicopters. And then you go to the shopping mall and you see the folks that are exercising, you see the middle class that’s got money and that’s got money to not eat GMO and they look healthy, whether they’re Black or White or Hispanic and you are envious of them. You hate them.

 

That’s what you see when the dumbed down country folks come into town in the big city and see the beautiful people in the elite areas of town. They get freaked out, they get insecure and that’s what happens when you get the dumbed down poisoned inner-city people struggling to try to make it as well but born into an artificial, sick culture where we are bought millions of children a year and just say they’re not humans. Not even knowing any better.

 

So I don’t sit up here and look at poor pathetic country people whether they be Black or White or Hispanic and look down my nose at them. I don’t look at poor inner-city Black people, dumbed down, ignorant, brought up in the system. I feel sorry for them.   At the same time they have been forged into a political weapon, just like the poor people pouring in from Nicaragua and El Salvatore and Guatemala, some of the most dangerous, broken places in the world, a poisonous transfusion. Signing them on to the Democratic Party and the welfare class to be the new political enforcer class in this country. You can see what the technocracy’s doing, shipping in unlimited numbers of Somalis into Minnesota, into New York, into Las Vegas to take over the cab businesses. I’m not against the Somali people but you talk about coming from somewhere where the total breakdown of society, at absolute stoneage level, barbarism and culture and women treated worse than animals.

And it’s politically correct, oh what a neat culture, let’s adopt it, oh my gosh.

You’re wearing Levis, you’re a white guy driving a truck, that’s sick and racist and homophobic. I bet you don’t know how to read The New York Times. Oh my gosh, ook at the White man, how bad he is but oohh, oh, you’re from Somalia or Sudan, where they sexually mutilate the girls and don’t want them out of the house and then we can chain women up in houses here in America? Oh, that’s their culture, well, my culture is owning guns and treating women good and having private property and being wealthy and being successful and not being treated like a slave by the police, and I’m uppity and I’m not going to back down and I’m not going to be pushed around and that’s why the police treat me with respect because they know, I’ll take them to court, they know I’ll stand up to them. They want to be my server, they want to be a defender of the Constitution? I’ll support them, I’ll admire them. They want to turn into paramilitary thugs sitting on top of a rotting country for a bunch of dumbed down trash?

I’m not going to be treated like all the trash. I’m not going to lay down in the gutter. I’m not going to be run over any more. I’m not going to have bureaucrats come in my house or come in my office without warrants. I’m not going to kiss up to uniforms and badges. All that is just like ancient, wearing headdresses or crowns. I don’t like the Queen of England, I’m not going to bow down to her if she walked by. They invited me to go meet the Queen of England and said I had to bow to her, the woman, living off the people of England and her family, bunch of usurpers for hundreds of years, make me want to throw up. All of your ceremonial outfits, all of your headdresses, all of your costumes, all of it don’t mean Jack crap if they don’t symbolise the Republic and freedom, then I’m all for symbols. Symbols are power, I’ll wear a decoration of a nickel belt buckle that celebrates men not turning their guns in or their weapons in, in the face of tyrants. But as a leader of Babylon, King George III of Mexico or others.

I want to open the phones up to get your take on Ferguson, the clear evidence that there are Justice Department, New Black Panther Party, trouble makers there clearly trying to stir up violence. Our reporters almost got hit by a car the other night, driving through the crowd that looked like they were targeting and the people jumped out in ski-masks and then ran off. We’ve got MSNBC reporters, CNN reporters being hit by rocks over the last few days, Chris Hayes was the latest. We’ve got CNN reporters being arrested by the police. It’s a bunch of mindless barbarism and it really displays how ignorant the public is but also how ignorant the police are of just what’s going on around them. And from the beginning, the Feds have been there, advising and even before the beginning of this the Feds were there giving them the training.

That leads me to the story that’s up on Drudgereport.com, it’s up on Infowars.com. We ended the broadcast yesterday as this story broke, a document, army preparing to use lethal force against unarmed civilians during full-scale riots in the United States but they need to set the precedent to the military and the police feel like this is a reasonable mission from a left-hand side of Drudge. Army manual that tells of preparations for full-scale riots in the USA and shooting,“unarmed civilians with sniper response”, lethal sniper response.

You can read the declassified, publically released army document released last Friday. The public discovered it yesterday, we wrote about it. No dinosaur media has picked up on this bombshell document yet. In fact guys, I printed the document yesterday, it’s in the tv studio.         All Americans are being robbed by the Globalists, all Americans. 99.99% of us are on the bad receiving end of this tyranny and all of us should value freedom, value justice, value the truth and decry everything we see that is a problem and try to do something about it.

 

I want to give the phone number out and then when we start the next hour we will talk to our reporters on the ground about what they witnessed in Ferguson and more. And we’re going to break down civil disturbances, Manual ATP 3-39.33 (U.S. Army Techniques Publication 3-39.33: Civil Disturbances

August 15, 2014) that was created in April this year, an approved Republic release distribution unlimited, last Friday, Headquarters Department of the Army.

North Com (United States Northern Command) is now operating openly against the American people. The army is publicly along with the marines training to take on the Tea Party gun owners, rural communities that will not go under martial law. That is the main focus on record. They will use unsavoury thugs and people, opportunistically burning down buildings and throwing molotov cocktails at police as the pretext for rollout the MRAPs (Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Vehicle), the sound cannons, the rubber bullets, the cameras and microphones on the street corners that are beyond 1984. That’s what’s happening. They will use the threat of Al Qaeda to take our liberties as well and publicly arm them. When the public wakes up they just rename them ISIS, ESIS, ISIS, IS, all the different names that they’ve given it to confuse the public. This is being run against the people of Ferguson, against the thugs that have come in, against the State Police, the local police, the National Guard. They’re all there, compartmentalised, being taught the new police state model that was rolled out in Seattle in ’99 and Katrina in 2005 and at the WTEO.

We caught the WTEO repeatedly in Canada, in Ottawa, in London, England, in Pittsburgh Pennsylvania, on record, even came out mainstream news, police dressed up like anarchists, attacking police, so that they would have a pretext to then attack the crowd. We have not seen any clear, verified evidence of that this time because there are reporters there and we know what to look for.

It could be that the police are being moral but it is on record that they hired anarchists and provocateurs, protected them, the Delta Force ran it. That came out in three Seattle papers, Seattle Post, Intelligencer, you name it and they had a film about it. But I do know it’s being provocateured by the Tax Free Foundations, Ford Foundation and others that are on record funding the Black Panther Party, the New Black Panther Party, La Raza, Metzia, all these race-based groups, they’ve caught the Southern Poverty Law Centre and other groups running like supremacist groups. Not to infiltrate groups, setting them up to then run around and say unsavoury things to stir up communities so they can drive the Black community into the hands of the mindless, idiot clowns of the New Black Panther Party who undoubtedly are useful idiots in the lower ranks, Feds at the top.

Khalid Mohammed, “We kill the women, we kill the children, we kill the babies, we kill the beautiful blue-eyed babies, that’s right because the blue-eyed baby is going to grow up to be a big devil and going to try to kill our babies. And then every nine months the white woman lays on her back and out rolls reinforcements to the military manufacturing centre.”

By the way, you can actually pull out that clip, I can almost do a perfect imitation, I love to do imitations as everybody knows. “Oh dear, ask the earth creature”. You found racist doing a Khalid Mohammed imitation. I’m not against Martians and I just did a Martian imitation. What about an Optimus Prime, “Are robots transformer rollout, transformer rollout, I’m Optimus Prime” Another one, “This is CNN” Pretty good, huh? Sometimes I’ve got to have some gallows humour as I’ve said many times.

Here’s a toll-free number, I want to talk to first-time callers about Ferguson but also

entertain me in this, what else is this diverting and distracting us from? Obama has ended our borders, legalised all the illegals. That story starts to really wake people up now this happens. Nobody’s talking about the VA scandal (Veterans Health Administration scandal of 2014)and the death list. No-one got in trouble, they had death panels for the veterans. I mean right there, what an evil Government. No-one’s talking about all-time high meat prices across the board because of them shutting down farms all over the country and dollar devaluations. No-one’s talking about in Texas, Breitbart, 45 million to educate foreign miners just this year, according to the Texas controller, the Texas Education General Council audit. No-one’s talking about it because this is this big pageant. Oh my gosh, somebody got killed. One man dies, it’s a tragedy, 10,000 die it’s a statistic. Joseph Stalin said that and it’s true.   You are [

Blacks, I talk to Black folks about that, liberal Blacks, they go, “Nobody want them

ugly Black babies”. You’ve heard that, I’ve played the clips here.

I’ve had Black leaders in my studios, socialists, in front of Rob doing everything, had the interview and it’s so sickening, basically saying there’s too many Black people. I mean, it’s so sick because they’re the inside operatives of the Democratic Party. They’re to make sure Blacks never find liberty, never find monetary success or dangle out oh, you can be a rap star or a NFL football player. I mean how many slots are there for professional sports? Or to be a hip-hop sensation. Maybe 10,000 slots for all the professional sports and all the rap jobs and all the coolness. You’ve got how many million Black people in this country?   12% of the population’s Black, what’s 12% divided out of 315 million. I know there’s not a slot for 99.9% of people but to believe that everybody, and by the way it’s not Black folks, they’re not the only ones, almost everybody White person I know coming out of college thinks they’re going to be a rock star, a hip-hop star or a movie star and they’re all totally delusional, running around looking for movie stars all around them.

I mean, what a delusional society, everybody wants to be some big star, it is just so bizarre. Because that’s how you attain something, you don’t be an honourable father, an honourable mother and help your community and build a better society and do wood carving in the garage or paint and go sell your paintings on the weekends because you love them, or get into gardening or get into mountain biking, or rock climbing or get into going and helping at the local shelter, or poetry. There are a lot of happy people that have their hobby, their passion, they’re fulfilled, they’re not depressed. You’ve had all these young people and all these yuppies. Let me tell you, living in Austin now, Austin has been ruined where I live.

Toll-free number to join us is 8002599231. We’re going to open the phone system up right now, 8002599231,8002599231. I’m just getting into the basic problem in society. LA has collapsed. You’ve got the young women of America, every beautiful girl when she’s 18, I mean a large percentage of them try to go there to be movie stars. They go, yeah I got a movie that you can be a star in then there’s such a glut of young women having sex on tape that it drives the prices down where they don’t even make the money a hooker makes. You make less money in porn than you would make selling your body because the market is such a glut. But they called you a star so you did it. See, but I’m a star, I’m in Playboy, oh my gosh. Why, she’s a model for this or a model for that. And then those women, even the ones that are able to have some success, they’re totally unhappy. Or when their looks go they kill themselves. They never had kids, never had grandkids, never experienced the life cycle, never experienced the racial memories that are activated in your race memory when you follow the rights of passage.

41 million Black people in the United States, we’ve been given the number, and there’s about 10,000 slots to be a star. Maybe. A lot of those slots are C and D and F down to Z level celebrities. To them there’s all these industries now where everyone’s going to be a tango dancer, or a tap dancer, or they’re going to be in a marching band or they’re going to be in acting lessons and it’s all these delusional people, going and taking acting lessons over and over and over again. They try to be movie stars, they try to be extras in a movie and then they worship whoever’s been successful and it’s so boring, so unfulfilling, so fake and the point is, if they just randomly like to go take acting classes and want to be extras in movies because they like it, that’s fine. But that’s not what 90 plus percent of them are doing. They’re doing it because they feel unfulfilled unless they can be on the television or on the big screen.

I’ve been on the big screen, everyone who tried to be in movies was put in movies. I’ve been offered to be in a bunch of other movies, big roles, I said no because I know how boring it is. I don’t want to quit my radio show and go live in Los Angeles, or go live in New Zealand, or go live in Toronto or New York and just be in that empty culture. Do you know how empty the people are that are movie stars? Do you know how unhappy they are?   Why do you think Hollywood over and over again has reached out to me? It’s because they’re looking for something real. And the ones that are awake are talking about these issues now. Like Richard Linklater whose always been a Laken, never been a celebrity and the films he makes. I’m going to take your phone calls when we come back and we’re going to have the reporters on at 12h30 so that I can get to a lot of phone calls.

Our reporters are on the ground investigating the Provocateurs and the Ford Foundation, the New Black Panther Party and they’re also documenting the police and their bizarre behaviour, arresting innocent reporters that have done nothing and still shooting at people.

It’s just unbelievable. I’m just going to report what’s going on there. It is now emerging more and more that Mr Brown, “More than a dozen witnesses confirm Ferguson cop’s version of the shooting”. “Michael Brown rushed officer”, CNN. “Militant protesters growing in number, many coming from out of state”. Yeah, it’s like a war party, it’s like a war drum.

All cultures do it, it’s like a primitive, like the Scots coming out of the hills that come down to attack the English. It’s the same deal, or the Zulus coming to attack the Dutch in South Africa. I mean that’s what this is. Or the native Americans getting in a war party. That’s what it is, go out and show everybody you’re a man, show them. And how do you do that now?   You wear gold chains around your neck, your pants hanging down around your butt and then you run around and scream racial epitaphs all day because somebody got killed by the police.   Then that falls into the hands of the system that uses it. “Senator says the protesters have invaded, literally”.   That’s what the State Police have said as well, it’s true, our reporters have confirmed it. “Teargas, smoke, hang over St Louis suburb”. “Black power is chanted”. “Dead teen’s grandfather to Obama, ‘I voted for you, so come meet me’”.

It all just becomes a big grandstanding event, it’s like a party or something. Buchanan goes on to say that it’s “1960’s like riots could cause voter rebuke for President”. “Some liberal outfits creating almost lynch mob mentality”. I agree with that. “MSNBC crew hit with rocks during live coverage”. Yeah, they’re there worshipping the violent demonstrators and been covering up for them and race-baiting, remember the White House, and they’re been hit by rocks.   It’s like our reporters are being yelled at and screamed at now by the more and more militant sub-like people that are showing up.   We’ll be back.   Is that Marcus Morellis in that video?   I haven’t even got our reporters or CNN and all the rest of it but it’s just so, man.

Find my copy of it or buy a copy of it, The Battle for Gold a collection of letters back to the senate by Julius Caesar on how to manage what are the French and Germans and Austrians today. The Gauls, the Visigoths, the Ostrogoths and it’s the exact same trouble stuff, the exact same manipulation, the exact same police shield walls and phalanxes, nothing really changes. How to manipulate crowds, how to provocateur and how to divide and conquer and how to set the women up as the rulers over the men. And then I just sit here and watch the social engineering going on as the Pentagon prepares to mull Americans down en masse. That will be during a total economic collapse and that’s where the Establishment is manoeuvring us, that’s my point. I want to go to your phone calls.

 

Again, I am your host Alex Jones if you’ve just joined us. Steve the Russian, Henry Mad Wit, Brent and others. You know folks, I like you to say what your name is but sometimes it turns into a whole stunt end of itself. If you can just announce whatever name you want on air plus we never tend to get the names right anyways, you know, I’m just sick of everything. Why is the public so gullible? Why are people so easily played? Why are people so unread? Why are they so dumbed down?   Why do people love to be chops? Why do they love to buy into Nigerian emails?   Why are there just people everywhere around me in Austin, hopping around wanting to be stars, and all narcissistic mindless. I know so many people that when they don’t become famous they then become mentally ill and decide they’re famous. Man, I just can’t handle it anymore. I’m not trying to be negative, I’m sorry if I start getting a little bit angry. I’m just watching the premeditated divide and conquer take down of our country and it makes me want to throw up. And if the public would just wake up to it, we could turn this whole thing around.

The Russian in Washington, you’re on the air, go ahead.

CA:     Yeah, Alex, the Russian here. The reason I put my name like that is so people can understand that I really am from Russia. Moved here in ’91 after the collapse of the Soviet Union and I just wanted to give a little bit of background.

AJ       I think that’s very interesting if you can parallel living under Communism versus what you see happening here. Go ahead.

CA:     Well yeah exactly, that’s my point. I moved here after the collapse of the Soviet

Union and I currently live in [unclear speech 00:41:50] Washington. What I don’t

understand is like for example, our family, we all moved here and my parents had

lived under the Soviet Communism for quite a bit. After they moved here, things

started to change, their minds started to change and after, I wouldn’t know, like

maybe five, ten years my parents just kind of went silent about Russia and the

United States. When we first moved here it was a great country, we were living in

Toledo, Ohio and we could leave the doors and windows open at night and nobody

every came in, nobody stole anything, everything was perfectly fine.

 

Now the economy is degraded, the people are degraded, the minds of the inhabitants

of the United States have completely gone awol and now it’s gotten to the point

where even my own parents are in denial. Like hey, the economy is collapsing,

everything is getting worse. I show them evidence from documents, news, articles,

everything, I try to explain to them and they look at me and go, “Nikol, nothing is

ever going to happen to the United States”. I’m like, are you kidding me? It’s like we

came from Russian where everything collapsed, you knew that everything was going

down. The Afghani war, there was never any but it was part of the reason of

Russia’s bankruptcy. America has so many wars that we’re currently in, we have

bases around the world, we have over a 100 bases around the world.

 

AJ       And we’re being manoeuvred artificially to do that. Excellent points. People have become spectators. Television has done it. The minds have been programmed for the public to be jelly fish and to not even be real people.

I haven’t even got into a ton of the news. I’ve mainly just been talking about the state of humanity that every metric shows is degenerating. Now you do have highly educated informed people that are aware of what’s going on, they capitalise off of all of this and their attitude is just continue on like that because there’s nothing you can do for the unwashed masses, they’ve always been slaves, they’ll always be slaves. But I’ve studied Renaissance, I’ve studied…

 

Stupidity is demonstrated by people lacking knowledge they could achieve.

Political correctness can be defined as the telling of a lie out of the cowardice attempt to avoid upsetting fools unwilling to face the truth.

Antisemitism is when one blames Jews or Israel for issues, he does not blame others.

Craziness is, when one always does the same but expects different outcome.

If a monkey thinks “I am a monkey”, then it is already a human.

A man with roots should go for a pedicure.

Gutmenschen (benevolent people) are those who intend to appear good-hearted, yet unscrupulously exploit the conscience of others to serve their own purposes via self-staged outrage.

 

http://www.jsbielicki.com/jsb-79.htm

DJ Psycho Diver Sant – too small to fail
Tonttu Korvatunturilta Kuunsilta JSB
Tip tap tip tap tipetipe tip tap heija!
www.psychosputnik.com
http://www.saatchionline.com/jsbielicki
https://psychosputnik.wordpress.com/

 

 

 

 

[1] The Alex Jones Show Tuesday August 19 2014

[2] The Alex Jones Show Tuesday August 19 2014

Einige klare Worte über Hamas / Few clear words about Hamas (german/english)

Einige klare Worte über Hamas

 

Wenn wir den Frieden im Nahen Osten ernst nehmen, dann müssen wir damit aufhören so zu tun als hätte es Israel mit einem rationalem Feind mit dem man Verhandeln kann zu tun, denn dadurch schüren wir eine gewaltige politische Lüge, deren Anziehungskraft mittlerweile so stark ist, dass sie die Realität verzerrt.

Es war die Hamas, welche den Gazastreifen in eine Kriegszone verwandelt hat, nicht Israel. Und sie werden dies immer wieder wiederholen. Wieder und wieder… Denen sind die Menschen dort egal und sie zu opfern ist im Zuge des Dschihad tragbar. Warum sonst gibt es im Gazastreifen keine bombensicheren Schutzunterkünfte (aber unzählige betonierte Tunnel mit Elektrizität und allem was man braucht, um sich dort aufzuhalten, für Angriffe gegen Israel)? Außer natürlich für die tapferen Hamas Kämpfer welche uns immer wieder mitteilen, dass sie den Tod mehr lieben als wir das Leben, sich jedoch unverzüglich ins Sichere verkriechen, sobald die Bomben eintreffen, jedoch Frauen und Kinder auf sich selbst gestellt zurück lassen oder sich zwischen oder hinter ihnen verstecken. Man wird doch davon ausgehen können, dass sie sich bei ihrem Einsatz von Raketen über ihre eigenen Staatsgrenzen hinaus auch einmal Gedanken über den Schutz gewöhnlicher Zivilisten vor möglichen Vergeltungsschlägen gemacht hätten. Nein! Die bauen lieber Luxus-Hotels um naive (oder verlogene) Zivilisten aus dem Westen unterzubringen, bei denen man darauf zählen kann, dass sie Hamas als heldenhafte Opfer und die Israelis als Neo-Nazi Unterdrücker darstellen werden.

In Wirklichkeit sind Hamas die Nazis (und die SS). Deren politische Agenda ist geradezu identisch mit denselben, völkermordartigen Illusionen und vernunftswidrigem, brutalem Hass auf Juden, dafür dass sie Juden sind. Eigentlich haben die Nazis moralisch sogar einen Vorsprung im Gegensatz zur Hamas. Die waren zwar auch psychisch kranke, mordende Drecksäcke, aber wenigstens nutzten sie nicht ihre eigenen Leute als menschliches Schutzschild.

Hamas sind die eigenen Menschen im Gazastreifen völlig egal. Jene wollen doch, dass diese ums Leben kommen, insbesondere Kinder, deren Körper wundervolle Propaganda bieten. Das ist der Grund dafür, dass sie sie ständig in die Schusslinie schicken; als Kanonenfutter… Als lediglich weitere Waffe, die benutzt und ausrangiert oder gemartert werden kann, was im Islam eine beschönigende Beschreibung für ein sinnlos vergeudetes Leben ist.

Israel will Frieden und wollte den schon immer. Es ist ein modernes, zivilisiertes Land und ein weltweiter, technologischer Führer. Das letzte woran Israel interessiert ist, ist ein Krieg – das sollte jedem offensichtlich sein. Israel möchte nichts lieber sehen, als dass die Menschen im Gazastreifen gedeihen und wohlhabend werden und glücklich und frei leben können. Sie würden das ganze sogar finanzieren, wenn sie daran glauben würden, dass es funktionieren würde, aber die Hamas will Menschen nicht glücklich und frei sehen. Hamas will, dass es ihnen erbärmlich geht, damit sie den Juden dafür die Schuld geben können, da sie, Hamas, Islamische Fanatiker sind, Dschihadisten, welche die selbe Mentalität aufweisen, welche auch ins World Trade Center flog und dann, ratet mal wem die Schuld gab? Den Juden.

Sie haben die Menschen im Gazastreifen bestochen, um sie auf einer politischen Ebene zu wählen, haben dann aber sobald sie gewählt waren, ihre Religion mit eiserner Faust durchgesetzt. Glaubt wirklich jemand, dass die nochmal gewählt werden würden? Das werden wir nie wissen, denn wenn eine islamische Regierung einmal gewählt wurde, bleibt diese für immer gewählt und jeder der dies bestreiten mag kann erwarten ermordet zu werden, damit deren Leiche dann von einem Motorrad hinter sich hergezogen werden kann, so wie letzte Woche im Gazastreifen passiert ist.

Dies sind Männer, die sich von ihrem harten und gewaltsamen Glauben hypnotisiert jeglicher Ähnlichkeit moralischen Anstands oder Mitgefühls berauben um dann glücklich jemanden zu ermorden, der seine Freude bei einer Hochzeit in Form von Gesang Ausdruck verlieh, so wie letzte Woche im Gazastreifen passiert ist. Das Singen ist in ihrem Islamischen Paradies nämlich verboten, Freude ist verboten, Fröhlichkeit ist haraam. Sie berufen sich in ihrer Gründungsurkunde auf den heiligen Koran, besonders den Absatz über das Töten von Juden. Der Absatz ist ein großer Favorit. Und sie bringen ihren Kindern bei, dass das höchste Ziel, das man im Leben haben kann, ist beim Ermorden von Judengetötet zu werden. Und dies sind Leute, mit denen die Israelis verhandeln sollen? Es wäre einfacher und vernünftiger mit einer Klapperschlange zu reden.

Nehmen wir also mal an Sie seien der israelische Premierminister. Was tun Sie? Wie gehen Sie mit Menschen um die Sie, und jeden der wie Sie ist, um jeden Preis tot sehen wollen und deren Einstellung unveränderlich ist. Ihnen Land zusprechen? Siedlungen abbauen? Das wurde versucht und hat nicht funktioniert. Ist das keinem aufgefallen? Israel baute Siedlungen ab und entwurzelte Tausende von Menschen, als es aus dem Gazastreifen abzog und was erhielt es? Ein Bombardement von Raketen und Bomben, das bis zu heutigem Tag anhält, also ist es klar, dass der Abbau von Siedlungen nicht zum Erfolg führt. Was gibt es noch für Möglichkeiten? Streitschlichtung? Diplomatie? Den Friedensprozess wieder beginnen? Hmm. In Ihren Träumen vielleicht. Es gibt keinen Friedensprozess und so lange es Hamas gibt, wird es den auch nicht geben, denn es gibt keine einseitige Münze. Und Hamas hat sehr deutlich geäußert, dass sie kein Interesse an Friedensverhandlungen haben und niemals haben werden. Es steht in ihrer Gründungsurkunde, prüfen Sie es selbst. Frieden wäre Un-Islamisch. Keine Verhandlungen und kein Nachgeben im Dschihad. Desweiteren wird in der Urkunde festgehalten, „bis jeder Jude im Nahen Osten entweder verjagt oder ermordet wurde“. Das ist ihr Ziel und es ist nicht verhandelbar.

Warum tun wir weiterhin so, als wollten sie etwas anderes? Die Gründungsurkunde verbietet anderen auch die Friedensverhandlung. Sollte also jemals Frieden ausbrechen, würde die Hamas diesen mit Sicherheit schleunigst wieder beenden. All das mal beiseite. Wir nehmen Mal an, es ginge wirklich um Gebiete und Politik und so gäbe es trotzdem eine weitere Runde von Verhandlungen. Lasst uns noch ein nutzloses Abkommen ausarbeiten. Lasst uns wieder an einen Tischsetzen und die Abläufe durchspielen, um dann wieder Nobelpreise rundherum auszuhändigen. Wir müssen dabei gesehen werden, wie wir etwas unternehmen, auch wenn es Nichts ist und das wird es in der Tat sein, denn die Verhandlung mit Leuten,wie der Hamas ist vergleichbar mit dem Gießen von Licht in ein schwarzes Loch.

Die wollen keinen Frieden, die wollen jüdisches Blut. Mehr gibt es da nicht zu sagen. Deswegen verletzen sie jede Waffenruhe, deswegen sind ihre eigenen Leute entbehrlich, deswegen ist kein Abkommen mit ihnen das Papier wert, auf dem es geschrieben würde. Deswegen gibt es keine zwei-Staaten Lösung und wird es nie geben, solange es diese Leute gibt und deswegen müssen sie entschieden und pnachhaltigbesiegt werden, sonst nimmt dieser Wahnsinn nie ein Ende.

Diese fanatischen, gewalttätigen Barbaren loszuwerden ist der einzige Weg für Palästinenser je wirklich frei zu sein und wenn dem Rest von uns wirklich was am Frieden liegt, sollten wir ehrlich genug sein, dies zuzugeben.

 

Few clear words about Hamas

 

If we’re serious about peace in the Middle East, then we need to stop pretending that the Israelis are dealing with a rational enemy they can negotiate with because in doing that, we’re helping to feed a massive political lie whose gravitational force has become so great, it has warped reality.

It’s Hamas who turned Gaza into a warzone recently, not Israel, and it’s Hamas who will do so again, and again, and again. They don’t care about the people there, they regard them as expendable in the course of jihad. Why do you think there are no bomb shelters in Gaza?   Except of course for the brave Hamas fighters who keep telling us they love death more than we love life, yet who scuttle away to safety as soon as the bombs come in, leaving the women and children to fend for themselves. Wouldn’t you suppose, as they were lobbying rockets over the border every day that they would’ve given some thought to protecting ordinary people from possible retaliation? No, they’d rather build luxury hotels to accommodate gullible Western journalists who can be trusted to portray them as heroic victims and the Israelis as neo-Nazi oppressors.

In fact, it’s Hamas who are the Nazis (and SS). Their political agenda is virtually identical, with the same genocidal supremacist illusions and the same irrational violent hatred of Jews, for being Jews.   Actually, the Nazis have a moral edge on Hamas. They were psychotic murdering scumbags as well but at least they didn’t use their own people as human shields.

Hamas don’t give a damn about the people of Gaza, they want them to be killed, especially the children, whose bodies make wonderful propaganda. That’s why they deliberately put them in the firing line as fodder, as just another weapon to be used and discarded or martyred, which is the Islamic euphemism for somebody whose life has been thrown away for absolutely nothing.

Israel wants peace and has always wanted peace. It’s a modern, civilized country and a world technological leader. The last thing it needs is war, that should be obvious to everyone. Israel would like nothing better than for Gaza to be thriving and prosperous and the people to be happy and free. They would even bankroll it if they thought it would work but Hamas don’t want the people happy and free, they want them miserable and blaming Jews for it because Hamas are Islamic fanatics, Jihadists, the same mentality that flew into the Twin Towers and then blamed, guess who, the Jews.

They bribed the people of Gaza to elect them on a political platform, but once in power, they enforced their religion with an iron fist. Does anyone seriously think they’d be elected again? We’ll never know because once elected, an Islamist government is elected forever and anybody who wants to argue about it can expect to be murdered and their corpse dragged through the streets behind a motorcycle, as happened last week, in Gaza.

These are men who are so hypnotised by their callous and violent religion and so bereft of any semblance of moral decency or compassion, that they’ll happily murder someone for expressing a moment of joy by singing at a wedding, as happened last week, in Gaza. Singing is outlawed in their Islamic paradise, joy is forbidden, happiness is haraam. They invoke the Quran in their founding Charter, especially the passage about killing Jews. That’s a big favourite. And they teach their children that the highest thing they can aspire to, is to kill themselves by killing Jews. And these are the people the Israelis are supposed to negotiate with? It will be easier to reason with a rattle snake.

So let’s say you are the Israeli Prime Minister. What do you do? How do you deal with people who want you and everybody like you, dead at any price and whose position is not negotiable. Give up territory? Dismantle settlements? That’s been tried and it doesn’t work or didn’t anybody notice? Israel dismantled settlements and uprooted thousands of people when it withdrew from Gaza and what did it get? A barrage of rockets and bombs that hasn’t stopped to this day so clearly, dismantling settlements doesn’t work. What else have we got? Mediation? Diplomacy? Restart the peace process? Huh, in your dreams. There is no peace process and there never will be as long as Hamas is around because there’s no such thing as a one-sided coin. And Hamas have made it clear they have no intention of negotiating peace, ever. It’s written right into their Charter, look it up. Peace would be un-Islamic. No negotiation and no let-up in Jihad. Also enshrined in the Charter, until every Jew in the Middle East has been driven out or killed. That’s what they want and it’s not negotiable.

Why do we keep pretending that they want something else? The Charter also forbids anybody else from negotiating peace. So if peace ever does break out we can be sure Hamas will put a stop to it in double quick time. But let’s ignore all that and pretend that it’s all about territory and politics and have another round of negotiations anyway. Let’s hammer out another worthless accord. Let’s get round a table and go through the motions again and then hand out Nobel prizes all round. We have to be seen to be doing something, even if it’s nothing and nothing is what it will be in spades because negotiating with the likes of Hamas is like pouring light into a black hole.

They don’t want peace at any price, they want Jewish blood. End of story. That’s why they break every ceasefire, that’s why their own people are expendable, that’s why no agreement with them is worth the paper it’s written on. That’s why there is no two-state solution and never will be as long as they’re around and that’s why they need to be defeated decisively and permanently, or this madness will never, ever stop.

Shaking off these fanatical, violent barbarians is the only way the Palestinian people will ever be truly liberated and if the rest of us really care about peace, we should be honest enough to admit that.

 

Epilog:

Dummheit ist, wenn jemand nicht weiß, was er wissen könnte.

Political correctness ist, wenn man aus Feigheit lügt, um Dumme nicht zu verärgern, die die Wahrheit nicht hören wollen.

 

Stupidity is demonstrated by people lacking knowledge they could achieve.

Political correctness can be defined as the telling of a lie out of the cowardice attempt to avoid upsetting fools unwilling to face the truth.

 

http://www.jsbielicki.com/jsb-79.htm

DJ Psycho Diver Sant – too small to fail
Tonttu Korvatunturilta Kuunsilta JSB
Tip tap tip tap tipetipe tip tap heija!
www.psychosputnik.com
http://www.saatchionline.com/jsbielicki
https://psychosputnik.wordpress.com/